Laboratory of Pathology East Netherlands (LabPON), Hengelo, The Netherlands.
Philips Research Europe, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Histopathology. 2018 Nov;73(5):784-794. doi: 10.1111/his.13691. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
The benefits of digital pathology for workflow improvement and thereby cost savings in pathology, at least partly outweighing investment costs, are being increasingly recognised. Successful implementations in a variety of scenarios have started to demonstrate the cost benefits of digital pathology for both research and routine diagnosis, contributing to a sound business case encouraging further adoption. To further support new adopters, there is still a need for detailed assessment of the impact that this technology has on the relevant pathology workflows, with an emphasis on time-saving.
To assess the impact of digital pathology adoption on logistic laboratory tasks (i.e. not including pathologists' time for diagnosis-making) in the Laboratorium Pathologie Oost Nederland, a large regional pathology laboratory in The Netherlands.
To quantify the benefits of digitisation, we analysed the differences between the traditional analogue and new digital workflows, carried out detailed measurements of all relevant steps in key analogue and digital processes, and compared the time spent. We modelled and assessed the logistic savings in five workflows: (i) routine diagnosis; (ii) multidisciplinary meeting; (iii) external revision requests; (iv) extra stainings; and (v) external consultation. On average, >19 working hours were saved on a typical day by working digitally, with the highest savings in routine diagnosis and multidisciplinary meeting workflows.
By working digitally, a significant amount of time could be saved in a large regional pathology laboratory with a typical case mix. We also present the data in each workflow per task and concrete logistic steps to allow extrapolation to the context and case mix of other laboratories.
数字病理学在改善工作流程方面的益处,以及由此带来的病理成本节约(至少在一定程度上超过了投资成本),正越来越受到认可。在各种场景下的成功实施开始展示数字病理学在研究和常规诊断中的成本效益,为鼓励进一步采用提供了合理的商业案例。为了进一步支持新的采用者,仍然需要详细评估这项技术对相关病理工作流程的影响,重点是节省时间。
评估数字病理学的采用对荷兰Laboratorium Pathologie Oost Nederland 大型区域病理实验室的物流实验室任务(即不包括病理学家进行诊断的时间)的影响。
为了量化数字化的益处,我们分析了传统模拟和新数字工作流程之间的差异,对关键模拟和数字流程中的所有相关步骤进行了详细的测量,并比较了所花费的时间。我们对五个工作流程中的物流节省进行了建模和评估:(i)常规诊断;(ii)多学科会议;(iii)外部修改请求;(iv)额外染色;和(v)外部咨询。平均而言,每天通过数字化工作可节省超过 19 个工作小时,在常规诊断和多学科会议工作流程中节省最多。
在具有典型病例组合的大型区域病理实验室中,通过数字化工作可以节省大量时间。我们还按每个工作流程和具体物流步骤呈现了数据,以便将其外推到其他实验室的背景和病例组合中。