Baidoshvili Alexi, Khacheishvili Mariam, van der Laak Jeroen A W M, van Diest Paul J
Laboratory of Pathology East Netherlands (LabPON), Hengelo, The Netherlands.
David Tvildiani Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Pathol Int. 2023 Mar;73(3):127-134. doi: 10.1111/pin.13309. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
Even though entirely digitized microscopic tissue sections (whole slide images, WSIs) are increasingly being used in histopathology diagnostics, little data is still available on the effect of this technique on pathologists' reading time. This study aimed to compare the time required to perform the microscopic assessment by pathologists between a conventional workflow (an optical microscope) and digitized WSIs. WSI was used in primary diagnostics at the Laboratory for Pathology Eastern Netherlands for several years (LabPON, Hengelo, The Netherlands). Cases were read either in a traditional workflow, with the pathologist recording the time required for diagnostics and reporting, or entirely digitally. Reading times were extracted from image management system log files, and the digitized workflow was fully integrated into the laboratory information system. The digital workflow saved time in the majority of case categories, with prostate biopsies saving the most (68% time gain). Taking into account case distribution, the digital workflow produced an average gain of 12.3%. Using WSI instead of conventional microscopy significantly reduces pathologists' reading times. Pathologists must work in a fully integrated environment to fully reap the benefits of a digital workflow.
尽管全数字化的显微组织切片(全切片图像,WSIs)在组织病理学诊断中越来越多地被使用,但关于该技术对病理学家阅片时间的影响,目前仍缺乏相关数据。本研究旨在比较病理学家在传统工作流程(光学显微镜)和数字化全切片图像之间进行显微评估所需的时间。多年来,荷兰东部病理实验室(LabPON,亨厄洛,荷兰)在初步诊断中一直使用全切片图像。病例的阅片方式分为两种,一种是传统工作流程,由病理学家记录诊断和报告所需的时间;另一种是完全数字化阅片。阅片时间从图像管理系统日志文件中提取,并且数字化工作流程已完全集成到实验室信息系统中。在大多数病例类别中,数字化工作流程节省了时间,其中前列腺活检节省的时间最多(节省了68%)。考虑到病例分布情况,数字化工作流程平均节省了12.3%的时间。使用全切片图像而非传统显微镜显著减少了病理学家的阅片时间。病理学家必须在完全集成的环境中工作,才能充分受益于数字化工作流程。