Washirasaksiri Chaiwat, Raksasagulwong Prateep, Chouriyagune Charoen, Phisalprapa Pochamana, Srivanichakorn Weerachai
Division of Ambulatory Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 20;18(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3289-1.
Although death certificates (DCs) provide valuable health information which may help to guide local health policies and priorities, there is little information concerning their validity in Thailand. First-year general practitioners (GPs) have a major role in DC completion, especially in provincial general hospitals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and factors influencing the accuracy of DCs completed by first-year GPs in Thailand, compared with the cause of death (COD) derived from medical records by experts.
This retrospective study was conducted at 14 provincial general hospitals in Thailand during the June 2011 to May 2012 study period. Medical records and DCs completed by first-year GPs who graduated from 16 Thai medical schools were sampled. The cause of death recorded on the DCs was compared with the medical conditions and histories derived from patient medical records. A cross-sectional survey of the 210 GPs who completed the DCs reviewed in this study was also conducted. Respondent GPs' demographic characteristics, factors associated with COD, and COD coding system were evaluated.
Five hundred and sixty-three medical records and corresponding DCs were included. Of those, 36.9% of DCs were found to be correct. Common mistakes included incorrect sequence of events leading to death (32.4%), and mode of death use (26.2%). Of the 210 GPs, 155 questionnaires were completed and returned. The mean time spent on recording COD and completing DCs in the medical school curriculum was 2.1 ± 0.9 h and only 27.7% of participants had experience in completing DCs by themselves during medical school. Mean medical school GPA was significantly higher in the correctly completed DC GPs group than in the incorrectly completed DC GPs group (3.3 ± 0.4 vs. 3.2 ± 0.3; p = 0.03). However, no significant difference was found for other factors associated with COD between groups.
This is the first study documenting gaps and disparities in DC accuracy, and factors influencing completion of DCs among first-year GPs in Thailand, based on a clinical assessment of medical records. GPs made errors on 63.1% of DCs. This finding suggests that proven education, system-related support, and additional training interventions specific to DC completion are required.
尽管死亡证明(DC)提供了宝贵的健康信息,有助于指导当地的卫生政策和重点工作,但关于其在泰国的有效性的信息却很少。第一年的全科医生(GP)在填写死亡证明方面起着主要作用,尤其是在省级综合医院。本研究的目的是评估泰国第一年全科医生填写的死亡证明的准确性以及影响其准确性的因素,并与专家从病历中得出的死亡原因(COD)进行比较。
本回顾性研究于2011年6月至2012年5月研究期间在泰国的14家省级综合医院进行。对从16所泰国医学院毕业的第一年全科医生填写的病历和死亡证明进行抽样。将死亡证明上记录的死亡原因与从患者病历中得出的医疗状况和病史进行比较。还对本研究中填写死亡证明的210名全科医生进行了横断面调查。评估了应答全科医生的人口统计学特征、与死亡原因相关的因素以及死亡原因编码系统。
纳入了563份病历和相应的死亡证明。其中,36.9%的死亡证明被认为是正确的。常见错误包括导致死亡的事件顺序不正确(32.4%)以及死亡方式的使用(26.2%)。在210名全科医生中,155份问卷被填写并返回。在医学院课程中记录死亡原因和填写死亡证明所花费的平均时间为2.1±0.9小时,只有27.7%的参与者在医学院期间有自己填写死亡证明的经验。正确填写死亡证明的全科医生组的医学院平均绩点显著高于错误填写死亡证明的全科医生组(3.3±0.4对3.2±0.3;p = 0.03)。然而,两组之间与死亡原因相关的其他因素没有显著差异。
这是第一项基于病历临床评估记录泰国第一年全科医生在死亡证明准确性方面的差距和差异以及影响死亡证明填写的因素的研究。全科医生在63.1%的死亡证明上出现了错误。这一发现表明,需要经过验证的教育、与系统相关的支持以及针对死亡证明填写的额外培训干预措施。