Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2018 Sep;34(9):e3116. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3116. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
A benchmark study by Boileau et al tested 6 commonly used numerical schemes for 1D wave propagation, for their ability to capture the main features of pressure, flow, and area waveforms in large arteries. While all numerical schemes showed good agreement in pressure and flow waveforms for smaller arterial networks, the simplified trapezium rule method proposed by Kroon et al showed an overestimation for the systolic pressure of 1% in proximal regions and an underestimation of 3% in distal regions in comparison with the 5 other schemes when using a larger arterial network, published as the ADAN56 model. The authors attributed this difference to the neglection of the dynamic part of the pressure at vessel junctions. Carson et al resolved these differences by proposing 2 methods to implement the dynamic part of the pressure in the simplified trapezium rule method scheme. In the present study, an alternative method is introduced extending the work by Kroon et al. This alternative method consists of a new 0D element, which is placed at vessel junctions. The strength of this new element is the ease of implementation and its flexible coupling with other elements, without introducing additional degrees of freedom or the need of a penalty function. This new approach is compared with 5 other numerical schemes, which already have the dynamic part of the pressure incorporated. The new method shows excellent agreement with these schemes for the ADAN56 model.
Boileau 等人进行了一项基准研究,测试了 6 种常用于一维波传播的数值方案,以评估它们在捕捉大动脉中压力、流量和面积波形主要特征方面的能力。虽然所有数值方案在较小的动脉网络中对压力和流量波形都表现出良好的一致性,但 Kroon 等人提出的简化梯形法则方法在使用更大的动脉网络(如 ADAN56 模型)时,与其他 5 种方案相比,近端区域的收缩压高估了 1%,远端区域低估了 3%。作者将这种差异归因于在血管连接处忽略了压力的动态部分。Carson 等人通过提出两种方法来解决这些差异,即在简化梯形法则方案中实现压力的动态部分。在本研究中,引入了一种替代方法来扩展 Kroon 等人的工作。这种替代方法包括在血管连接处放置一个新的 0D 元素。这个新元素的优点是易于实现,并且可以与其他元素灵活耦合,而不会引入额外的自由度或需要罚函数。这种新方法与已经包含压力动态部分的其他 5 种数值方案进行了比较。新方法在 ADAN56 模型上与这些方案表现出极好的一致性。