• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用自制雾化器的定量吸入器与雾化器用于哮喘发作住院儿童支气管扩张剂治疗的比较

MDI with DIY Spacer versus Nebulizer for Bronchodilator Therapy in Children Admitted with Asthmatic Attack.

作者信息

Leelathipkul Lalit, Tanticharoenwiwat Pattara, Ithiawatchakul Jutinan, Prommin Danu, Sirisalee Pasu, Junhunee Parinya, Poachanukoon Orapan

出版信息

J Med Assoc Thai. 2016 Jul;99 Suppl 4:S265-74.

PMID:29927182
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inhaled bronchodilator treatment given via the pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) with spacer has been recommended for an acute asthma treatment. Unfortunately, most of commercially available spacers are at high cost while a do-it-yourself (DIY) spacer has lower cost as it is made from plastic bottle and siphon pump which are inexpensive and easilyfound materials.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare treatment response in nebulizer and DIY spacer used for asthmatic children.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A prospective, randomized control study was conducted in children aged 1-15 years old hospitalized for mild to moderate asthmatic attack at Thammasat University Hospital between June 2014 and March 2015. The patients were divided into 2 groups, receiving β2-agonist via nebulization and via pMDI with DIY spacer. Their vital signs and oxygen saturation were monitored and asthma scores were also recorded at admission, 24 hours, 48 hours, and before discharge. The satisfaction of equipment use was evaluated employing questionnaires.

RESULTS

40 childrens were enrolled with male at 72.5% and mean age at 3.1±1.6 years old. There was no significant difference in efficacy of β2-agonist among 2 groups when comparing in consideration of vital signs, oximetry, asthma scores and hospital stay. However, there were significantly different on side effect in which the DIY spacer had less tachycardia and agitation. Satisfaction of parents and healthcare workers were higher in DIY spacer.

CONCLUSION

MDI with DIY spacer was able to be used effectively when compared with nebulization to treat mild to moderate acute exacerbations of asthma in children admitted in hospital.

摘要

背景

通过带有储雾罐的压力定量吸入器(pMDI)给予吸入性支气管扩张剂治疗已被推荐用于急性哮喘治疗。不幸的是,大多数市售储雾罐成本高昂,而自制(DIY)储雾罐成本较低,因为它由塑料瓶和虹吸泵制成,这些材料价格低廉且容易找到。

目的

本研究旨在比较用于哮喘儿童的雾化器和自制储雾罐的治疗反应。

材料与方法

2014年6月至2015年3月期间,在泰国法政大学医院对1至15岁因轻度至中度哮喘发作住院的儿童进行了一项前瞻性随机对照研究。患者分为两组,分别通过雾化和使用自制储雾罐的pMDI接受β2激动剂治疗。监测他们的生命体征和血氧饱和度,并在入院时、24小时、48小时和出院前记录哮喘评分。采用问卷调查评估设备使用满意度。

结果

共纳入40名儿童,男性占72.5%,平均年龄为3.1±1.6岁。在考虑生命体征、血氧饱和度、哮喘评分和住院时间时,两组之间β2激动剂的疗效无显著差异。然而,在副作用方面存在显著差异,自制储雾罐的心动过速和躁动较少。家长和医护人员对自制储雾罐的满意度更高。

结论

与雾化相比,使用自制储雾罐的MDI能够有效治疗住院儿童的轻度至中度急性哮喘加重。

相似文献

1
MDI with DIY Spacer versus Nebulizer for Bronchodilator Therapy in Children Admitted with Asthmatic Attack.使用自制雾化器的定量吸入器与雾化器用于哮喘发作住院儿童支气管扩张剂治疗的比较
J Med Assoc Thai. 2016 Jul;99 Suppl 4:S265-74.
2
A comparative study of efficacy of salbutamol via metered dose inhaler with volumatic spacer and via dry powder inhaler, easyhaler, to nebulization in mild to moderate severity acute asthma exacerbation in childhood.一项关于沙丁胺醇通过带有储雾罐的定量气雾剂、干粉吸入器(易纳器)给药与雾化吸入给药治疗儿童轻至中度急性哮喘加重期疗效的比较研究。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Oct;91 Suppl 3:S115-23.
3
Comparison of salbutamol efficacy in children--via the metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with Volumatic spacer and via the dry powder inhaler, Easyhaler, with the nebulizer--in mild to moderate asthma exacerbation: a multicenter, randomized study.沙丁胺醇在儿童中的疗效比较——通过装有 Volumatic 储雾罐的计量吸入器(MDI)和干粉吸入器 Easyhaler 与雾化器比较——在轻度至中度哮喘加重中的疗效:一项多中心、随机研究。
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2011 Mar;29(1):25-33.
4
Home-made spacers for bronchodilator therapy in children with acute asthma: a randomised trial.自制支气管扩张剂治疗儿童急性哮喘的间隔器:一项随机试验。
Lancet. 1999 Sep 18;354(9183):979-82. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)12445-5.
5
Salbutamol via metered-dose inhaler with spacer versus nebulization for acute treatment of pediatric asthma in the emergency department.在急诊科,使用带储物罐的定量吸入器与雾化吸入沙丁胺醇治疗儿童哮喘急性发作的比较
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004 Oct;20(10):656-9. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000142948.73512.81.
6
A Randomized Trial Comparing Metered Dose Inhalers and Breath Actuated Nebulizers.一项比较定量吸入器和呼吸驱动雾化器的随机试验。
J Emerg Med. 2018 Jul;55(1):7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
7
Management of acute asthma in children using metered dose inhaler and small volume nebulizer.使用定量吸入器和小容量雾化器治疗儿童急性哮喘
J Pak Med Assoc. 2006 Dec;56(12):595-9.
8
Randomized controlled trial of salbutamol aerosol therapy via metered dose inhaler-spacer vs. jet nebulizer in young children with wheezing.沙丁胺醇气雾剂通过定量吸入器-储雾罐与喷射雾化器治疗幼儿喘息的随机对照试验
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2005 May;39(5):466-72. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20204.
9
Efficacy of salbutamol by nebulizer versus metered dose inhaler with home-made non-valved spacer in acute exacerbation of childhood asthma.雾化吸入沙丁胺醇与使用自制无瓣储雾罐的定量气雾剂治疗儿童哮喘急性发作的疗效比较
Mymensingh Med J. 2012 Jan;21(1):66-71.
10
Metered dose inhaler with spacer versus dry powder inhaler for delivery of salbutamol in acute exacerbations of asthma: a randomized controlled trial.带储雾器的计量吸入器与干粉吸入器在哮喘急性加重期沙丁胺醇给药中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Indian Pediatr. 2004 Jan;41(1):15-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Do-It-Yourself Diabetes Management: Perspectives of a Patient, a Physician, and an Ethicist.糖尿病自我管理:患者、医生及伦理学家的观点
Clin Diabetes. 2022 Jan;40(1):70-74. doi: 10.2337/cd20-0058.
2
Commercial versus home-made spacers in delivering bronchodilator therapy for acute therapy in children.商用与自制间隔器在儿童急性治疗中递送支气管扩张剂疗法的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;2008(2):CD005536. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005536.pub2.