Tangkittikasem Thidaporn, Wongpraparut Nattawut, Panchavinnin Pradit, Tresukosol Damras, Chotinaiwattarakul Chunhakasem, Phankingthongkum Rewat, Tungsubutra Wiwun, Udompunturak Suthipol, Pongakasira Rungtiwa
J Med Assoc Thai. 2016 Sep;99(9):996-1004.
To compare clinical and electrocardiographic (ECG) features between Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TC) and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
We retrospectively reviewed clinical, electrocardiographic, and laboratory features of 20 consecutive TC patients and 155 consecutive STEMI patients who were activated for fast-track coronary angiography and were ultimately diagnosed with either TC or STEMI and compared these data between the two groups.
Patients with TC were older (p = 0.001), more often female (p = 0.001), had more often been triggered by intense emotional or physical stress (p = 0.001) or illness (p = 0.001), and had a lower rate of smoking (p = 0.005) than STEMI patients. Compared with patients who presented with anterior wall STEMI, those with TC less commonly had Q waves (30.0% vs. 62.9%, p = 0.007) and reciprocal change (0.0% vs. 37.1%, p = 0.001), and had a lower rate of ST-segment elevation in lead V1 (5.0% vs. 59.8%, p = 0.001). ST-segment depression was also more common in TC in lead aVR (20.0% vs. 2.1%, p = 0.008). Previously proposed ECG criteria had low sensitivity, but high specificity in our patients. Our proposed point scoring model includes the use of both clinical and ECG findings. According to our proposed model, a score ≥4 had 90% sensitivity and 98% specificity in differentiating TC from acute anterior STEMI (AUC = 0.976, p<0.001).
In patients activated for fast-track coronary angiography because of acute coronary ST-segment elevation syndrome, a number of clinical and ECG features differ between TC patients and patients with true STEMI. Our proposed point scoring model that uses clinical and ECG findings demonstrated improved diagnostic accuracy in differentiating TC from acute anterior STEMI.
比较Takotsubo心肌病(TC)与ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的临床和心电图(ECG)特征。
我们回顾性分析了20例连续的TC患者和155例连续的STEMI患者的临床、心电图和实验室特征,这些患者因快速冠状动脉造影被激活,最终被诊断为TC或STEMI,并比较了两组之间的这些数据。
与STEMI患者相比,TC患者年龄更大(p = 0.001),女性更常见(p = 0.001),更常由强烈的情绪或身体应激(p = 0.001)或疾病(p = 0.001)诱发,吸烟率更低(p = 0.005)。与前壁STEMI患者相比,TC患者出现Q波(30.0%对62.9%,p = 0.007)和对应性改变(0.0%对37.1%,p = 0.001)的情况较少,V1导联ST段抬高率较低(5.0%对59.8%,p = 0.001)。aVR导联ST段压低在TC中也更常见(20.0%对2.1%,p = 0.008)。先前提出的心电图标准在我们的患者中敏感性较低,但特异性较高。我们提出的积分评分模型同时使用了临床和心电图结果。根据我们提出的模型,积分≥4在区分TC与急性前壁STEMI时敏感性为90%,特异性为98%(曲线下面积 = 0.976,p<0.001)。
在因急性冠状动脉ST段抬高综合征而被激活进行快速冠状动脉造影的患者中,TC患者与真正的STEMI患者在一些临床和心电图特征上存在差异。我们提出的同时使用临床和心电图结果的积分评分模型在区分TC与急性前壁STEMI时显示出更高的诊断准确性。