Suppr超能文献

德国本土种子认证十年——总结。

Ten years of native seed certification in Germany - a summary.

机构信息

VWW - Verband deutscher Wildsamen- und Wildpflanzenproduzenten e.V., Langgoens, Germany.

出版信息

Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2019 May;21(3):383-388. doi: 10.1111/plb.12866. Epub 2018 Jul 24.

Abstract

Many renaturation projects and compensation areas are based on the use of seeds from regional indigenous wild plants; in the following: native or regional seeds. Despite this, such seeds make up only a small proportion of the total number of seeds used for greening projects; in Germany, for example, it is only around 1% (=200 t per year). Although the market for regional seeds is small, it is highly competitive. High-priced native seeds compete with flower mixes of unspecified origin and can only be differentiated from them by reliable quality seals. A quality assurance system based on seed legislation (EU Directive 2010/60, preservation mixtures) has been developed in a few European countries. However, quality assurance ends with the sale of the seeds. Thus, seed use remains unmonitored, and often unsuitable material, or material foreign to the region, is planted in restoration areas. Unfortunately, nature conservation has not made seed-based restoration one of its key issues, neither at the European nor at the national level. Currently there are many different local and regional standards, methods and private certificates that are confusing for users and which provide little continuity and predictability for producers. We recommend the establishment of an EU directive or a broadly agreed recommendation to the EU member states, spearheaded by nature conservation, which would define the standards for producing and using native seeds (e.g. harmonised regions that cross national borders, quality regulations). At the same time, wild plant interest groups should combine existing structures in order to strengthen seed-based restoration through international cooperation.

摘要

许多自然恢复项目和补偿区域都基于使用来自区域本土野生植物的种子;在以下情况下:本地或区域种子。尽管如此,这类种子在用于绿化项目的种子总数中只占很小的比例;例如,在德国,这一比例仅约为 1%(=200 吨/年)。尽管区域种子市场规模较小,但竞争非常激烈。高价的本地种子与来源不明的花卉混合物竞争,只能通过可靠的质量印章将其与后者区分开来。少数欧洲国家已经制定了基于种子立法(欧盟指令 2010/60,保护混合物)的质量保证体系。然而,质量保证在种子销售后就结束了。因此,种子的使用仍然没有得到监测,而且在恢复区域中经常种植不合适的或非本地的材料。不幸的是,自然保护组织既没有将基于种子的恢复作为其关键问题之一,也没有在欧洲层面或国家层面上这样做。目前有许多不同的地方和区域标准、方法和私人证书,这让使用者感到困惑,并且为生产者提供的连续性和可预测性也很低。我们建议由自然保护组织牵头,制定一项欧盟指令或一项得到欧盟成员国广泛认可的建议,为生产和使用本地种子(例如,跨越国界的协调区域、质量法规)定义标准。与此同时,野生植物利益集团应结合现有结构,通过国际合作加强基于种子的恢复。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验