School of Civil Engineering & Built Environment, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
School of Civil Engineering, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 21;13(6):e0199449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199449. eCollection 2018.
In the public transport industry, travellers' perceived satisfaction is a key element in understanding their evaluation of, and loyalty to ridership. Despite its notable importance, studies of customer satisfaction are under-represented in the literature, and most previous studies are based on survey data collected from a single city only. This does not allow a comparison across different transport systems. To address this underrepresentation, this paper reports on a study of train passengers' satisfaction with the fare paid for their most recent home-based train trip in five Australian capital cities: Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, and Perth. Two data sources are used: a nation-wide survey, and objective information on the train fare structure in each of the targeted cities. In particular, satisfaction with train fares is modelled as a function of socio-economic factors and train trip characteristics, using a random parameters ordered Logit model that accounts for unobserved heterogeneity in the population. Results indicate that gender, city of origin, transport mode from home to the train station, eligibility for either student or senior concession fare, one-way cost, and waiting time as well as five diverse interaction variables between city of origin and socio-economic factors are the key determinants of passenger satisfaction with train fares. In particular, this study reveals that female respondents tend to be less satisfied with their train fare than their male counterparts. Interestingly, respondents who take the bus to the train station tend to feel more satisfied with their fare compared with the rest of the respondents. In addition, notable heterogeneity is detected across respondents' perceived satisfaction with train fare, specifically with regard to the one-way cost and the waiting time incurred. An intercity comparison reveals that a city's train fare structure also affects a traveller's perceived satisfaction with their train fare. The findings of this research are significant for both policy makers and transport operators, allowing them to understand traveller behaviours, and to subsequently formulate effective transit policies.
在公共交通行业中,乘客的满意度是理解他们对出行的评价和忠诚度的关键因素。尽管其重要性显著,但在文献中,对客户满意度的研究仍然不足,而且大多数先前的研究都是基于从单个城市收集的调查数据。这使得无法进行不同交通系统之间的比较。为了解决这种代表性不足的问题,本文报告了一项关于澳大利亚五个首府城市(悉尼、墨尔本、布里斯班、阿德莱德和珀斯)火车乘客对其最近一次基于家庭的火车旅行所付票价满意度的研究。使用了两个数据源:一项全国性调查,以及目标城市中火车票价结构的客观信息。特别是,使用随机参数有序 Logit 模型,根据人口中的未观察到的异质性,将对火车票价的满意度建模为社会经济因素和火车旅行特征的函数。结果表明,性别、原籍城市、从家到火车站的交通方式、是否有资格享受学生或老年人优惠票价、单程成本和等待时间以及原籍城市与社会经济因素之间的五个不同交互变量是乘客对火车票价满意度的关键决定因素。特别是,这项研究表明,女性受访者往往比对等的男性受访者对他们的火车票价更不满意。有趣的是,与其他受访者相比,乘坐公共汽车去火车站的受访者往往对他们的票价更满意。此外,还检测到受访者对火车票价的满意度存在显著差异,特别是单程成本和所产生的等待时间。城市间的比较表明,城市的火车票价结构也会影响乘客对火车票价的感知满意度。这项研究的结果对政策制定者和交通运营商都具有重要意义,使他们能够了解乘客的行为,并随后制定有效的交通政策。