Department of Psychology, Neuroscience Concentration, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA 23173, United States.
Department of Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, Randolph-Macon College, Ashland, VA 23005, United States.
Neuroscience. 2018 Aug 21;386:121-136. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.06.010. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
Prior research with a rat model of behavioral therapy [i.e., effort-based reward (EBR) contingency training] suggests that strengthened associations between physical effort and desired outcomes enhance neurobiological indices of resilience. In the current study, male and female Long-Evans rats were exposed to either six weeks of EBR training or noncontingent training prior to 10 days of exposure to chronic unpredictable stress (CUS). Subsequently, all animals were exposed to a problem-solving task and then trained in a spatial learning/foraging task, the Dry Land Maze (DLM). Following habituation training and test trials, rats were assessed in a probe trial that generated a prediction error (cognitive uncertainty). Results indicated that, during CUS exposure, contingency-training enhanced dehydroepiandrosterone/corticosterone ratios (consistent with healthier stress responses), especially in male rats. Additionally, contingency training increased exploratory behaviors in the probe trial as well as differentially influenced on-task problem-solving performance in males and females. Following the probe trial, brains were exposed to histological analyses to determine the effects of sex and contingency training on various neurobiological markers. Contingency training decreased BDNF-immunoreactivity (ir) in the hippocampus CA1 and lateral habenula, implicating differential neuroplasticity responses in the training groups. Further, coordinated fos-ir activation in areas associated with emotional resilience (i.e., motivation-regulation) was observed in contingent-trained animals. In sum, the current findings confirm that behavioral training is associated with neurobiological markers of emotional resilience; however, further assessments are necessary to more accurately determine the therapeutic potential for the EBR contingency training model.
先前使用行为治疗的大鼠模型[即基于努力的奖励(EBR)关联训练]的研究表明,加强身体努力与期望结果之间的关联可以增强神经生物学的弹性指数。在当前的研究中,雄性和雌性长耳大鼠在暴露于慢性不可预测的应激(CUS)之前接受了六周的 EBR 训练或非关联训练。随后,所有动物都接受了解决问题的任务,然后在空间学习/觅食任务(旱地迷宫(DLM))中进行训练。在适应训练和测试试验之后,对大鼠进行了预测误差(认知不确定性)的探针试验评估。结果表明,在 CUS 暴露期间,关联训练增强了脱氢表雄酮/皮质酮的比值(与更健康的应激反应一致),尤其是在雄性大鼠中。此外,关联训练增加了探针试验中的探索行为,并且对雄性和雌性的任务相关解决问题的表现产生了不同的影响。在探针试验之后,大脑暴露于组织学分析中,以确定性别和关联训练对各种神经生物学标志物的影响。关联训练减少了海马 CA1 和外侧缰核中的 BDNF-免疫反应性(ir),这暗示了训练组中的神经可塑性反应不同。此外,在关联训练的动物中观察到与情绪弹性(即动机调节)相关的区域中的fos-ir 协调激活。总之,当前的研究结果证实了行为训练与情绪弹性的神经生物学标志物有关;但是,需要进一步评估以更准确地确定 EBR 关联训练模型的治疗潜力。