Paulus Daniel J, Wadsworth Lauren Page, Hayes-Skelton Sarah A
Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Public Ment Health. 2015;14(2):94-106. doi: 10.1108/JPMH-09-2013-0064.
Improving mental health literacy is an important consideration when promoting expedient and effective treatment seeking for psychological disorders. Low recognition serves as a barrier to treatment (Coles and Coleman, 2010), and this article examines recognition by lay individuals of severity for three psychological disorders: social anxiety, generalized anxiety, and major depression using a dimensional approach.
Vignettes of mild/subclinical, moderate, and severe cases of each disorder were rated for severity by a team of expert assessors and 270 participants (mean age = 26.8; 76.7% women).
Difference ratings were calculated comparing participants' responses to scores from the assessors. A within-groups factorial ANOVA with LSD follow-up was performed to examine the effects of Diagnosis and Severity on difference ratings. Both main effects [Diagnosis, (2, 536)=35.26, ; Severity, (2, 536)=9.44, ] and the interaction were significant [(4, 1072)=13.70, ] all . Social anxiety cases were underrated in the mild/subclinical and moderate cases, generalized anxiety cases were underrated at all three severities, and major depression cases were overrated at all three severities.
Judgments of severity may underlie the low recognition rates for social anxiety disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. Future efforts should focus on improved recognition and education regarding anxiety disorders in the population, particularly before they become severe.
This project demonstrates the importance of considering judgments of symptom severity on a continuum, and in a range of cases, rather than just the ability to correctly label symptoms, when determining whether or not people recognize psychological disorders.
在促进对心理障碍寻求便捷有效的治疗时,提高心理健康素养是一个重要的考量因素。认知不足是治疗的障碍(科尔斯和科尔曼,2010年),本文采用维度方法研究非专业人士对三种心理障碍(社交焦虑症、广泛性焦虑症和重度抑郁症)严重程度的认知。
由一组专家评估人员和270名参与者(平均年龄 = 26.8岁;76.7%为女性)对每种障碍的轻度/亚临床、中度和重度病例的 vignettes进行严重程度评级。
计算参与者的回答与评估人员分数之间的差异评分。进行了带有LSD后续检验的组内析因方差分析,以检验诊断和严重程度对差异评分的影响。主效应[诊断,(2, 536)=35.26, ;严重程度,(2, 536)=9.44, ]以及交互作用均具有统计学意义[(4, 1072)=13.70, ]。社交焦虑症病例在轻度/亚临床和中度病例中被低估,广泛性焦虑症病例在所有三种严重程度下均被低估,重度抑郁症病例在所有三种严重程度下均被高估。
严重程度的判断可能是社交焦虑症和广泛性焦虑症认知率低的原因。未来的努力应集中在提高公众对焦虑症的认知和教育,尤其是在病情变得严重之前。
该项目表明,在确定人们是否认识到心理障碍时,考虑症状严重程度在连续体上以及一系列病例中的判断非常重要,而不仅仅是正确识别症状的能力。