• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《西班牙人格评估量表中的诈病与防御性:针对主要讲西班牙语的门诊患者的初步调查》

Malingering and Defensiveness on the Spanish Personality Assessment Inventory: An Initial Investigation with Mostly Spanish-Speaking Outpatients.

作者信息

Correa Amor A, Rogers Richard, Williams Margot M

机构信息

Federal Medical Center Carswell, Fort Worth, TX, USA.

University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA.

出版信息

Assessment. 2020 Sep;27(6):1163-1175. doi: 10.1177/1073191118778895. Epub 2018 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1177/1073191118778895
PMID:29929387
Abstract

Psychological assessments can be essentially invalidated by examinees' intentional response styles, such as (i.e., fabrication or marked overreporting of symptoms/impairment) and (i.e., denial or minimization of symptoms/impairment). As a psychometric strength, the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) has established validity indicators for identifying both response styles. With the United States' increasing ethnic and cultural diversity, predominantly Spanish-speaking individuals are now estimated in the range of 15 million persons. Unfortunately, very little research has been conducted on the Spanish-translated PAI regarding its effectiveness in clinical populations. Using a between-subjects design, a sample of mostly Spanish-speaking outpatients was randomly assigned to genuine, feigning, or defensive conditions. For feigning, PAI malingering indicators using rare symptoms strategies (i.e., Negative Impression [NIM] and Negative Distortion [NDS] scales) demonstrated moderate to large effect sizes. For defensiveness, the Defensive (DEF) index proved the most effective with a very large effect size ( = 1.68). Different cut scores were examined to increase the clinical utility of the Spanish PAI for determining response styles.

摘要

心理评估可能会因受测者故意的反应方式而基本失效,例如(即,编造或显著夸大症状/损伤)和(即,否认或淡化症状/损伤)。作为一种心理测量优势,人格评估量表(PAI)已经建立了用于识别这两种反应方式的效度指标。随着美国种族和文化多样性的增加,目前主要说西班牙语的人口估计在1500万人左右。不幸的是,关于西班牙语翻译版PAI在临床人群中的有效性,几乎没有进行过研究。采用组间设计,将主要说西班牙语的门诊患者样本随机分配到真实、伪装或防御条件组。对于伪装,使用罕见症状策略的PAI诈病指标(即负面印象[NIM]和负面扭曲[NDS]量表)显示出中等至较大的效应量。对于防御性,防御(DEF)指数被证明是最有效的,效应量非常大(=1.68)。研究了不同的划界分数,以提高西班牙语PAI在确定反应方式方面的临床效用。

相似文献

1
Malingering and Defensiveness on the Spanish Personality Assessment Inventory: An Initial Investigation with Mostly Spanish-Speaking Outpatients.《西班牙人格评估量表中的诈病与防御性:针对主要讲西班牙语的门诊患者的初步调查》
Assessment. 2020 Sep;27(6):1163-1175. doi: 10.1177/1073191118778895. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
2
Cross-validation of the PAI Negative Distortion Scale for feigned mental disorders: a research report.假装精神障碍的 PAI 负性扭曲量表的交叉验证:研究报告。
Assessment. 2013 Feb;20(1):36-42. doi: 10.1177/1073191112451493. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
3
Detecting Feigning in Adolescents on the Personality Assessment Inventory-Adolescent Form.人格评估量表-青少年版中青少年装病的检测。
J Pers Assess. 2020 Nov-Dec;102(6):751-757. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2019.1693389. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
4
The Effectiveness of the Personality Assessment Inventory With Feigned PTSD: An Initial Investigation of Resnick's Model of Malingering.伪装创伤后应激障碍情况下人格评估量表的有效性:雷斯尼克诈病模型的初步调查
Assessment. 2015 Aug;22(4):449-58. doi: 10.1177/1073191114552076. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
5
Operating characteristics of six response distortion indicators for the personality assessment inventory.用于人格评估量表的六种反应偏差指标的操作特征。
Assessment. 1998 Sep;5(3):203-14. doi: 10.1177/107319119800500301.
6
The detection of feigning using multiple PAI scale elevations: a new index.使用多个 PAI 量表升高来检测装病:一个新指标。
Assessment. 2013 Aug;20(4):437-47. doi: 10.1177/1073191112458146. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
7
Does the Convergent Validity of the PAI Antisocial Features Scale Depend on Offender Response Style?PAI反社会特征量表的聚合效度是否取决于罪犯的反应方式?
J Pers Assess. 2017 Sep-Oct;99(5):481-493. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1296846. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
8
Testing the incremental utility of the negative impression-positive impression differential in detecting simulated personality assessment inventory profiles.测试负面印象-正面印象差异在检测模拟人格评估量表剖面图中的增量效用。
J Clin Psychol. 2008 Mar;64(3):338-43. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20439.
9
Personality assessment inventory profile and predictors of elevations among dissociative disorder patients.人格评估量表特征及分离障碍患者量表升高的预测因素。
J Trauma Dissociation. 2013;14(5):546-61. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2013.792310.
10
Simulation of traumatic brain injury symptoms on the Personality Assessment Inventory: an analogue study.《人格评估量表中创伤性脑损伤症状的模拟:一项模拟研究》
Assessment. 2015 Apr;22(2):233-47. doi: 10.1177/1073191114539380. Epub 2014 Jun 24.