Suppr超能文献

比较不同手术方式治疗股骨转子间骨折的术中出血量和手术时间:网状 Meta 分析。

Comparing surgical interventions for intertrochanteric hip fracture by blood loss and operation time: a network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Yuhang Branch of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Department of Respiration, Yuhang Branch of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jun 22;13(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0852-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple operative treatments are available for the fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fractures. This analysis was conducted to provide guidance on the appropriate clinical choice to accommodate individual patients.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to identify relevant articles in databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adults with intertrochanteric femoral fractures were eligible if they compared 2 or more of the following interventions: proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA), percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) use, dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation, gamma nail (GN) fixation, and artificial femoral head replacement (FHR). Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to simultaneously compare all treatment methods.

RESULTS

In total, 24 active-comparator studies involving 3097 participants were identified. Across all populations, greater reductions in blood loss and operation time were observed for PFNA than for other treatments. In terms of bleeding, more blood loss was observed for DHS use than for the PFNA (SMD, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.01-1.96), PCCP (SMD, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.31-2.20), and GN (SMD, 0.26; 95% CI, - 0.35-0.87) techniques. However, a more beneficial effect was observed for DHS use than for FHR (SMD, - 0.23; 95% CI, - 1.26-0.81). DHS use resulted in a significantly longer duration of operation time than the PFNA (SMD, 0.75; 95% CI, - 0.02-0.75), PCCP (SMD, 0.61; 95% CI, - 0.20-1.44), and GN (SMD, 0.25; 95% CI, - 0.26-0.77) techniques. Similarly, greater reductions in operation time were observed for DHS use than for FHR (SMD, - 0.12; 95% CI, - 1.15-0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings provide supporting evidence demonstrating the superiority of PFNA over other treatments for intertrochanteric femoral fracture. PFNA treatment results in the lowest amount of blood loss and the shortest operation time. These findings add to the existing knowledge of intertrochanteric femoral fracture treatment options.

摘要

背景

对于股骨转子间骨折的固定,有多种手术治疗方法可供选择。本分析旨在为适应个体患者的需要提供适当的临床选择指导。

方法

系统检索数据库中相关文献。纳入比较 2 种及以上以下干预措施的成人股骨转子间骨折的随机对照试验(RCT):股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)、经皮加压钢板(PCCP)、动力髋螺钉(DHS)固定、伽马钉(GN)固定和人工股骨头置换(FHR)。采用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析同时比较所有治疗方法。

结果

共纳入 24 项有对照的研究,涉及 3097 名参与者。在所有人群中,PFNA 组的失血量和手术时间均明显少于其他治疗组。在出血方面,DHS 组的出血量明显多于 PFNA 组(SMD,1.96;95%CI,1.01-1.96)、PCCP 组(SMD,1.26;95%CI,0.31-2.20)和 GN 组(SMD,0.26;95%CI,-0.35-0.87)。然而,DHS 组的效果优于 FHR 组(SMD,-0.23;95%CI,-1.26-0.81)。DHS 组的手术时间明显长于 PFNA 组(SMD,0.75;95%CI,-0.02-0.75)、PCCP 组(SMD,0.61;95%CI,-0.20-1.44)和 GN 组(SMD,0.25;95%CI,-0.26-0.77)。同样,DHS 组的手术时间明显短于 FHR 组(SMD,-0.12;95%CI,-1.15-0.91)。

结论

这些发现为 PFNA 治疗股骨转子间骨折优于其他治疗方法提供了支持证据。PFNA 治疗导致的失血量最少,手术时间最短。这些发现增加了对股骨转子间骨折治疗选择的现有知识。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da87/6013997/a61717b54f7c/13018_2018_852_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验