Department of Articular and Traumatic Orthopedic Surgery, the Fourth People's Hospital of Guiyang, 91# Jiefang west Road, Guiyang, 550001, China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Apr 15;25(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07414-0.
The proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) with cement enhancement enhances the anchorage ability of internal fixation in elderly with osteoporotic intertrochanteric fracture. However, whether it is superior to hemiarthroplasty is still controversial. The present study aimed to determine which treatment has better clinical outcomes among older patients.
We retrospectively analyzed 102 elderly patients with osteoporosis who developed intertrochanteric fractures and underwent PFNA combined with cement-enhanced internal fixation (n = 52, CE group), and hemiarthroplasty (n = 50, HA group) from September 2012 to October 2018. All the intertrochanteric fractures were classified according to the AO/OTA classification. Additionally, the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative blood transfusion rates, postoperative weight-bearing time, hospitalization time, Barthel Index of Activities Daily Living, Harris score of hip function, visual analog (VAS) pain score, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.
The CE group had significantly shorter operative time, lesser intraoperative blood loss, lower blood transfusion rate, and longer postoperative weight-bearing time than the HA group. The CE group had lower Barthel's Index of Activities of Daily Living, lower Harris' score, and higher VAS scores in the first and third months after surgery than the HA group, but no difference was observed between the two groups from 6 months to 12 months. There was no significant difference in the total post-operative complications between the two groups.
The use of PFNA combined with a cement-enhanced internal fixation technique led to shorter operative time and lesser intraoperative blood loss and trauma in elderly patients as compared to HA.
股骨近端抗旋髓内钉(PFNA)联合骨水泥增强可增强老年骨质疏松性转子间骨折内固定的锚固能力。然而,它是否优于半髋关节置换术仍存在争议。本研究旨在确定哪种治疗方法对老年患者具有更好的临床效果。
我们回顾性分析了 2012 年 9 月至 2018 年 10 月收治的 102 例老年骨质疏松性转子间骨折患者,其中 52 例行 PFNA 联合骨水泥增强内固定(CE 组),50 例行半髋关节置换术(HA 组)。所有转子间骨折均按 AO/OTA 分类。比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术中及术后输血率、术后负重时间、住院时间、日常生活活动能力 Barthel 指数、髋关节功能 Harris 评分、视觉模拟(VAS)疼痛评分及术后并发症。
CE 组手术时间明显短于 HA 组,术中出血量明显少于 HA 组,术中及术后输血率明显低于 HA 组,术后负重时间明显长于 HA 组。术后 1 个月和 3 个月,CE 组的日常生活活动能力 Barthel 指数、髋关节功能 Harris 评分均低于 HA 组,VAS 评分均高于 HA 组,但 6 个月至 12 个月时两组间差异无统计学意义。两组术后总并发症发生率无统计学差异。
与 HA 相比,PFNA 联合骨水泥增强内固定技术可使老年患者的手术时间更短、术中出血量更少、创伤更小。