Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Biological Science and Technology National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Aug 18;2020:1896935. doi: 10.1155/2020/1896935. eCollection 2020.
The dynamic hip screw (DHS) with the addition of an angular stable trochanter-stabilizing plate (TSP) has been considered the ideal treatment for the unstable intertrochanteric fracture type. However, there have been few comparisons between DHS+TSP augmentation with intramedullary (IM) nailing. The aim of this retrospectively registered study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with the unstable type of intertrochanteric fractures treated with DHS+TSP or IM nailing (proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA)).
From June 2013 to April 2018, 358 patients with proximal femur fracture AO/OTA type 31A2 and 31A3 treated with PFNA or DHS+TSP and followed for ≥10 months postoperatively were included. The surgical-dependent outcome evaluation included the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative decrease in hemoglobin, and blood transfusion amount. Functional status was also measured. Radiographic findings and postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed.
The operation time was significantly shorter in the DHS+TSP group than that in the PFNA group for both A2 and A3 fractures (A2 type: 84.0 vs.96.4 min; < 0.05; A3 type: 102.4 vs.116.1 min; < 0.05). Postoperative decrease in hemoglobin was more significant in the PFNA group than that in the DHS+TSP group for both fracture types (A2 type: -1.88 vs. -1.29 (mg/dL); < 0.05; A3 type: -1.63 vs. -1.04 (mg/dL); < 0.05). However, the patients treated with DHS+TSP had significantly more residual pain than those treated with PFNA during the final follow-up (Visual Analog Scale score, A2 type: 28.4 vs.23.2; < 0.05; A3 type: 27.5 vs.23.6; < 0.05) and complained of greater implant irritation.
We found that DHS+TSP was associated with less operation time and less postoperative decrease in hemoglobin but more residual pain and implant irritation than those of PFNA. As a treatment for unstable intertrochanteric fracture, DHS+TSP provided ideal surgical outcomes which were not inferior to the PFNA.
动力髋螺钉(DHS)加角度稳定型转子稳定钢板(TSP)已被认为是不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的理想治疗方法。然而,DHS+TSP 与髓内(IM)钉治疗的比较研究较少。本回顾性注册研究旨在比较 DHS+TSP 或 IM 钉(股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA))治疗不稳定型股骨转子间骨折患者的临床结果。
从 2013 年 6 月至 2018 年 4 月,共纳入 358 例接受 PFNA 或 DHS+TSP 治疗的股骨近端骨折 AO/OTA 31A2 和 31A3 型患者,术后随访≥10 个月。手术相关的结果评估包括手术时间、术中失血量、术后血红蛋白下降量和输血量。还测量了功能状态。记录并分析了影像学发现和术后并发症。
A2 和 A3 骨折患者 DHS+TSP 组的手术时间明显短于 PFNA 组(A2 型:84.0 分钟比 96.4 分钟;<0.05;A3 型:102.4 分钟比 116.1 分钟;<0.05)。两组患者术后血红蛋白下降量均较 DHS+TSP 组明显(A2 型:-1.88 毫克/分升比-1.29 毫克/分升;<0.05;A3 型:-1.63 毫克/分升比-1.04 毫克/分升;<0.05)。然而,在末次随访时,DHS+TSP 组的患者残留疼痛明显多于 PFNA 组(视觉模拟评分,A2 型:28.4 分比 23.2 分;<0.05;A3 型:27.5 分比 23.6 分;<0.05),且植入物刺激感更强。
我们发现 DHS+TSP 与手术时间较短和术后血红蛋白下降量较少有关,但与 PFNA 相比, DHS+TSP 组的残留疼痛和植入物刺激感更多。作为不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的治疗方法,DHS+TSP 提供了理想的手术结果,并不逊于 PFNA。