Akalın İrfan, Tüfek Melek, Türkyılmaz Mustafa, Öztürk Faruk
Artvin State Hospital, Artvin, Turkey.
Sabuncuoğlu Şerefeddin Education and Research Hospital, Amasya, Turkey.
Int Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun;39(6):1337-1343. doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-0952-9. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
To compare the preoperative and postoperative measurements of optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) biometry and assessment of its refractive predictability.
A total of 114 eyes of 102 patients who underwent cataract treatment were prospectively examined. The axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), K (keratometry) 1, K2, K average (KAVE) and K astigmatic (KAST) values were recorded using Lenstar LS 900 (Haag-Streit, Koeniz, Switzerland) OLCR device. The IOL (intraocular lens) power was measured based on the SRK/T formula. The cases were divided into three subgroups according to AL (Group 1: AL < 22 mm, Group 2: 22 mm ≤ AL < 24 mm, Group 3: 24 mm ≤ AL). The mean absolute error (MAE) calculated for each eye.
The right eyes of 45 patients (44.1%), left eyes of 45 patients (44.1%), and both eyes of 12 patients (11.7%) were examined. The average AL in the preoperative period was 23.19 ± 1.01; it was 23.20 ± 0.99 in the postoperative period (p > 0.05). A significant deepening was detected in the postoperative ACD (preop 2.76 ± 0.38 mm, postop 3.81 ± 0.46 mm, p < 0.001). CCT was measured as 521.4 ± 36.3 µm in the preoperative period and as 530.8 ± 42.8 (p > 0.05) µm in the postoperative period. The average mean absolute error (MAE) was measured as 0.48 ± 0.41 D, whereas refractive error was - 0.081 ± 0.67 D. The MAE distribution of cases was found to be ≤ 1.5 D 109 (95.6%) eyes, and ≤ 2.0 D in 114 (100%) eyes. MAE values according to AL of the cases were calculated as 0.71 ± 0.83 D in group 1, 0.49 ± 0.43 D in group 2 and 0.41 ± 0.36 D in group 3 (p > 0.05).
When the measurement and refractive results of the OLCR biometry were evaluated, it was observed that there was a very satisfactory result and a predictable device compatible with the current literature. The SRK/T formula, one of the new generation formulas, has shown high MAE and RE results in eyes with AL ≤ 22 mm, although not statistically significant. Other new generation formulas should be tried in these eyes.
比较光学低相干反射测量法(OLCR)生物测量术前和术后的测量结果,并评估其屈光预测性。
对102例接受白内障治疗的患者的114只眼进行前瞻性检查。使用Lenstar LS 900(瑞士科尼茨哈格施特赖特公司)OLCR设备记录眼轴长度(AL)、中央角膜厚度(CCT)、前房深度(ACD)、晶状体厚度(LT)、角膜曲率计读数K1、K2、平均角膜曲率(KAVE)和角膜散光(KAST)值。根据SRK/T公式测量人工晶状体(IOL)度数。根据AL将病例分为三个亚组(第1组:AL<22mm,第2组:22mm≤AL<24mm,第3组:24mm≤AL)。计算每只眼的平均绝对误差(MAE)。
检查了45例患者的右眼(44.1%)、45例患者的左眼(44.1%)和12例患者的双眼(11.7%)。术前平均AL为23.19±1.01;术后为23.20±0.99(p>0.05)。术后ACD明显加深(术前2.76±0.38mm,术后3.81±0.46mm,p<0.001)。术前CCT测量值为521.4±36.3μm,术后为530.8±42.8μm(p>0.05)。平均平均绝对误差(MAE)测量值为0.48±0.41D,而屈光不正为-0.081±0.67D。发现病例的MAE分布在≤1.5D时有109只眼(95.6%),≤2.0D时有114只眼(100%)。病例根据AL的MAE值在第1组计算为0.71±0.83D,第2组为0.49±0.43D,第3组为0.41±0.36D(p>0.05)。
评估OLCR生物测量的测量和屈光结果时,观察到结果非常令人满意,且该设备与当前文献相符,具有可预测性。新一代公式之一的SRK/T公式在AL≤22mm的眼中显示出较高的MAE和屈光不正结果,尽管无统计学意义。这些眼中应尝试其他新一代公式。