Suppr超能文献

光学低相干反射生物测量术前与术后测量的比较及其屈光预测性评估。

Comparison of preoperative and postoperative measurements of optical low-coherence reflectometry biometry and assessment of its refractive predictability.

作者信息

Akalın İrfan, Tüfek Melek, Türkyılmaz Mustafa, Öztürk Faruk

机构信息

Artvin State Hospital, Artvin, Turkey.

Sabuncuoğlu Şerefeddin Education and Research Hospital, Amasya, Turkey.

出版信息

Int Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun;39(6):1337-1343. doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-0952-9. Epub 2018 Jun 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the preoperative and postoperative measurements of optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) biometry and assessment of its refractive predictability.

METHODS

A total of 114 eyes of 102 patients who underwent cataract treatment were prospectively examined. The axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), K (keratometry) 1, K2, K average (KAVE) and K astigmatic (KAST) values were recorded using Lenstar LS 900 (Haag-Streit, Koeniz, Switzerland) OLCR device. The IOL (intraocular lens) power was measured based on the SRK/T formula. The cases were divided into three subgroups according to AL (Group 1: AL < 22 mm, Group 2: 22 mm ≤ AL < 24 mm, Group 3: 24 mm ≤ AL). The mean absolute error (MAE) calculated for each eye.

RESULTS

The right eyes of 45 patients (44.1%), left eyes of 45 patients (44.1%), and both eyes of 12 patients (11.7%) were examined. The average AL in the preoperative period was 23.19 ± 1.01; it was 23.20 ± 0.99 in the postoperative period (p > 0.05). A significant deepening was detected in the postoperative ACD (preop 2.76 ± 0.38 mm, postop 3.81 ± 0.46 mm, p < 0.001). CCT was measured as 521.4 ± 36.3 µm in the preoperative period and as 530.8 ± 42.8 (p > 0.05) µm in the postoperative period. The average mean absolute error (MAE) was measured as 0.48 ± 0.41 D, whereas refractive error was - 0.081 ± 0.67 D. The MAE distribution of cases was found to be ≤ 1.5 D 109 (95.6%) eyes, and ≤ 2.0 D in 114 (100%) eyes. MAE values according to AL of the cases were calculated as 0.71 ± 0.83 D in group 1, 0.49 ± 0.43 D in group 2 and 0.41 ± 0.36 D in group 3 (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

When the measurement and refractive results of the OLCR biometry were evaluated, it was observed that there was a very satisfactory result and a predictable device compatible with the current literature. The SRK/T formula, one of the new generation formulas, has shown high MAE and RE results in eyes with AL ≤ 22 mm, although not statistically significant. Other new generation formulas should be tried in these eyes.

摘要

目的

比较光学低相干反射测量法(OLCR)生物测量术前和术后的测量结果,并评估其屈光预测性。

方法

对102例接受白内障治疗的患者的114只眼进行前瞻性检查。使用Lenstar LS 900(瑞士科尼茨哈格施特赖特公司)OLCR设备记录眼轴长度(AL)、中央角膜厚度(CCT)、前房深度(ACD)、晶状体厚度(LT)、角膜曲率计读数K1、K2、平均角膜曲率(KAVE)和角膜散光(KAST)值。根据SRK/T公式测量人工晶状体(IOL)度数。根据AL将病例分为三个亚组(第1组:AL<22mm,第2组:22mm≤AL<24mm,第3组:24mm≤AL)。计算每只眼的平均绝对误差(MAE)。

结果

检查了45例患者的右眼(44.1%)、45例患者的左眼(44.1%)和12例患者的双眼(11.7%)。术前平均AL为23.19±1.01;术后为23.20±0.99(p>0.05)。术后ACD明显加深(术前2.76±0.38mm,术后3.81±0.46mm,p<0.001)。术前CCT测量值为521.4±36.3μm,术后为530.8±42.8μm(p>0.05)。平均平均绝对误差(MAE)测量值为0.48±0.41D,而屈光不正为-0.081±0.67D。发现病例的MAE分布在≤1.5D时有109只眼(95.6%),≤2.0D时有114只眼(100%)。病例根据AL的MAE值在第1组计算为0.71±0.83D,第2组为0.49±0.43D,第3组为0.41±0.36D(p>0.05)。

结论

评估OLCR生物测量的测量和屈光结果时,观察到结果非常令人满意,且该设备与当前文献相符,具有可预测性。新一代公式之一的SRK/T公式在AL≤22mm的眼中显示出较高的MAE和屈光不正结果,尽管无统计学意义。这些眼中应尝试其他新一代公式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验