Department System-Ecotoxicology , Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ , Permoserstraße 15 , 04318 Leipzig , Germany.
Institute for Environmental Research (Biology V) , RWTH Aachen University , Worringerweg 1 , 52062 Aachen , Germany.
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Jul 17;52(14):7823-7832. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b01751. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
Risk assessments of toxicants in aquatic environments are typically based on the evaluation of concentrations in water or sediment. However, concentrations in water are highly variable, while the body burden may provide a better time-integrated measure of pesticide exposure and potential effects in aquatic organisms. Here, we quantified pesticide body burdens in a dominant invertebrate species from agricultural streams, Gammarus pulex, compared them with pesticide concentrations in water samples, and linked the pesticide contamination with observed ecological effects on macroinvertebrate communities. In total, 19 of 61 targeted analytes were found in the organisms, ranging from 0.037 to 93.94 ng g (wet weight). Neonicotinoids caused the highest toxic pressure among the pesticides detected in G. pulex. Using linear solvation energy relationships (LSERs), we derived equivalent pesticide concentrations in streamwater based on the body burden. These equivalent concentrations correlated with the concentrations in water samples collected after runoff (65% of variance explained). Pesticide pressure significantly affected the aquatic macroinvertebrate community structure, expressed as SPEAR, and caused, on average, 3-fold increased insecticide tolerance in G. pulex as a result of adaptation. The toxic pressure derived from body burden and from water samples similarly explained the change in community structure (68% and 64%). However, the increased tolerance of G. pulex to pesticides was better explained by the toxicity derived from body burden (70%) than by the toxicity from water samples (53%). We conclude that the internal body burden of macroinvertebrates is suitable to assess the overall pesticide exposure and effects in agricultural streams.
水生环境中毒物的风险评估通常基于对水或沉积物中浓度的评估。然而,水中的浓度变化很大,而体内负荷可能提供了更好的时间综合衡量水生生物中农药暴露和潜在影响的方法。在这里,我们量化了农业溪流中优势无脊椎动物物种——食蚊鱼(Gammarus pulex)体内的农药负荷,并将其与水样中的农药浓度进行比较,并将农药污染与观察到的大型无脊椎动物群落的生态效应联系起来。在总共 61 种目标分析物中,有 19 种在生物体中被发现,范围从 0.037 到 93.94ng/g(湿重)。在所检测到的食蚊鱼体内农药中,新烟碱类农药造成的毒性压力最高。利用线性溶剂化能量关系(LSERs),我们根据体内负荷推导出了水体中相当于农药的浓度。这些等效浓度与径流后采集的水样浓度(解释了 65%的方差)相关。农药压力显著影响了水生大型无脊椎动物群落结构,表现为 SPEAR,并且由于适应,平均导致食蚊鱼的杀虫剂耐受性增加了 3 倍。从体内负荷和水样推导的毒性压力同样解释了群落结构的变化(分别为 68%和 64%)。然而,食蚊鱼对农药的耐受性增加更多地可以用体内负荷推导的毒性(70%)来解释,而不是用水样推导的毒性(53%)来解释。我们得出的结论是,大型无脊椎动物的体内负荷适合评估农业溪流中的整体农药暴露和影响。