Arthur R M, Hoogenboom J, Baiker M, Taylor M C, de Bruin K G
School of Chemical Sciences, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand; Netherlands Forensic Institute, P.O. Box 24044, The Hague, 2490 AA, Netherlands.
Netherlands Forensic Institute, P.O. Box 24044, The Hague, 2490 AA, Netherlands.
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Aug;289:310-319. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.05.019. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
In the forensic discipline of bloodstain pattern analysis, it has been suggested that there is a blurred boundary between characterising the features of a bloodstain pattern and determining the mechanism(s) that led to its deposition. This study proposes that bloodstain pattern classification can become a distinct and logical process by implementing an automated approach. To do this, an automated bloodstain pattern recognition system was developed to enable the distinction of two types of spatter bloodstain patterns. First, global pattern features based on common bloodstain pattern properties were extracted from laboratory-generated impact spatter and cast-off bloodstain patterns. Following this, automated feature selection methods were used to identify the combination of features that best distinguished the two bloodstain pattern types. This eventually led to the training and testing of a Fisher quadratic discriminant classifier using separate subsets of the generated bloodstain patterns. When applied to the training dataset, a 100% classification precision resulted. An independent dataset comprising of bloodstain patterns generated on paint and wallpaper substrates were used to validate the performance of the classifier. An error rate of 2% was obtained when the classifier was applied to these bloodstain patterns. This automated bloodstain pattern recognition system offers considerable promise as an objective classification methodology which up to now, the discipline has lacked. With further refinement, including testing it over a wider range of bloodstain patterns, it could provide valuable quantitative data to support analysts in their task of classifying bloodstain patterns.
在血迹形态分析的法医学领域,有人提出,在描述血迹形态的特征与确定导致其形成的机制之间存在模糊的界限。本研究提出,通过实施自动化方法,血迹形态分类可以成为一个独特且合乎逻辑的过程。为此,开发了一个自动化血迹形态识别系统,以区分两种类型的飞溅血迹形态。首先,从实验室生成的撞击飞溅血迹和抛甩血迹形态中提取基于常见血迹形态属性的全局形态特征。在此之后,使用自动化特征选择方法来识别最能区分这两种血迹形态类型的特征组合。这最终导致使用生成的血迹形态的不同子集对费舍尔二次判别分类器进行训练和测试。当应用于训练数据集时,分类精度达到了100%。使用一个由在油漆和壁纸基材上生成的血迹形态组成的独立数据集来验证分类器的性能。当将分类器应用于这些血迹形态时,获得了2%的错误率。这种自动化血迹形态识别系统作为一种客观的分类方法具有很大的前景,而到目前为止,该领域一直缺乏这种方法。通过进一步完善,包括在更广泛的血迹形态范围内进行测试,它可以提供有价值的定量数据,以支持分析人员进行血迹形态分类的任务。