Department of Physical Therapy, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Department of Occupational Therapy, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Hum Mov Sci. 2019 Jun;65. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
This study proposed a new technology to assess the accuracy of Chinese handwriting by comparing every stroke movement between a template model and a handwritten script. It tested the feasibility of a computerized evaluation in the parameterization of the handwriting deterioration caused by impaired cognitive function. This study recruited 22 participants with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 14 with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI); 18 age- and gender-matched healthy elderly individuals made up the health control. The graphomotor tasks included drawing four straight lines (vertical, horizontal, and two diagonal) as well as writing Chinese words with simple vertical, horizontal and diagonal strokes. The temporal and spatial data were calculated to measure the motor coordination. The results in geographic drawing tests reveal significant differences among the three groups in task accuracy and movement fluency, especially in nonequivalent and wrist movements. The accuracy control of the graphic drawing in the AD and aMCI groups was significantly lower than that for the subjects in the normal group. These two groups also showed longer pauses in stroke movement with the handwriting tasks. The handwriting accuracy in the AD and aMCI groups was found to be significantly different from that of the subjects in the normal group. The results of this study can be used as an indicative reference for early detection of AD or aMCI, an objective evaluation for the effectiveness of interventions, and an assessment of disease progression.
本研究提出了一种新技术,通过比较模板模型和手写脚本之间的每个笔画运动,来评估中文手写的准确性。它测试了计算机化评估在手写认知功能障碍引起的劣化参数化中的可行性。本研究招募了 22 名阿尔茨海默病 (AD) 患者和 14 名遗忘型轻度认知障碍 (aMCI) 患者;18 名年龄和性别匹配的健康老年人组成健康对照组。图运动任务包括绘制四条直线(垂直、水平和两条对角线)以及用简单的垂直、水平和对角线笔画书写汉字。计算时间和空间数据以测量运动协调性。地理绘图测试的结果表明,在任务准确性和运动流畅性方面,三组之间存在显著差异,尤其是在非等效和手腕运动方面。AD 和 aMCI 组的图形绘制准确性控制明显低于正常组的受试者。这两组在书写任务中的笔画运动停顿时间也更长。AD 和 aMCI 组的手写准确性与正常组的受试者明显不同。本研究的结果可作为 AD 或 aMCI 的早期检测、干预效果的客观评估以及疾病进展的评估的指标性参考。