Suppr超能文献

反式全肩关节置换术后不稳定。

Instability after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Redwood City, CA, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Redwood City, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Nov;27(11):1946-1952. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.04.015. Epub 2018 Jun 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated patients with and without a prosthetic dislocation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) to identify risk factors for instability.

METHODS

Dislocation and nondislocation cohorts were established for analysis in 119 patients who had undergone RTSA at our institution between 2011 and 2014. Preoperative history and parameters pertaining to RTSA design were evaluated for correlation with instability. A logistic regression model was used to analyze independent predictors.

RESULTS

Eleven patients (9.2%) demonstrated instability in the early postoperative period. Dislocations occurred at an average of 8 weeks postoperatively (range, 3 days-5 months). The mean follow-up of all patients was 28 months (range, 6-106 months). Postoperative instability was associated with male gender, history of prior open shoulder surgery, and preoperative diagnoses of fracture sequelae, particularly proximal humeral or tuberosity nonunion. Absence of subscapularis repair was an independent predictor of instability. In addition, 5 of the 11 patients (45%) in the instability cohort sustained a second dislocation requiring another operation.

CONCLUSIONS

Redislocation after revision surgery for the initial dislocation was an unexpected and alarming finding. Treatment for the initial dislocation event by placement of a thicker polyethylene insert was inadequate in 45% of patients of our cohort and required another revision with a larger glenosphere and thicker humeral inserts. Initial instability after RTSA must be carefully managed, especially in the revision and post-traumatic setting. Exchange to a thicker polyethylene insert only carries a higher risk of recurrent instability.

摘要

背景

本研究评估了接受和未接受反式全肩关节置换术(RTSA)后假体脱位的患者,以确定不稳定的危险因素。

方法

对 2011 年至 2014 年在我院接受 RTSA 的 119 例患者进行了脱位和非脱位队列分析。评估了与不稳定相关的 RTSA 设计的术前病史和参数。使用逻辑回归模型分析独立预测因子。

结果

11 例(9.2%)患者在术后早期出现不稳定。脱位发生在术后平均 8 周(范围 3 天至 5 个月)。所有患者的平均随访时间为 28 个月(范围 6-106 个月)。术后不稳定与男性、既往开放性肩部手术史、骨折后遗症(尤其是肱骨头或结节骨不连)的术前诊断有关。肩胛下肌修复缺失是不稳定的独立预测因子。此外,不稳定组中有 5 例(45%)患者再次发生脱位,需要再次手术。

结论

在初次脱位的翻修手术中再次脱位是一个意外且令人警惕的发现。在我们的队列中,45%的患者通过放置更厚的聚乙烯插入物治疗初次脱位事件是不够的,需要另一次翻修,使用更大的球窝和更厚的肱骨插入物。RTSA 后最初的不稳定必须仔细处理,特别是在翻修和创伤后。仅更换更厚的聚乙烯插入物会增加反复不稳定的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验