Martin Leslie, Patel Ameen, Piggott Katrina, Wong Arthur, Patel Alexandra, Patel Matthew, Liu Yudong, Dhesy-Thind Sukhbinder, Wasi Parveen, You John J
Department of Medicine (Martin, Ameen Patel, Wong, Wasi, You), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Geriatric Medicine (Piggott), University of Toronto; Victoria College (Alexandra Patel), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (M. Patel), Dublin, Ireland; Schulich School of Dentistry & Medicine (Liu), Western University, London, Ont.; Departments of Oncology (Dhesy-Thind) and Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (You), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
CMAJ Open. 2018 Jun 22;6(2):E241-E247. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20170162. Print 2018 Apr-Jun.
Allied health care professionals can contribute meaningfully to goals-of-care discussions with seriously ill hospitalized patients and their families. We sought to explore the perspective of hospital-based allied health care professionals on their role in goals-of-care discussions and to identify barriers to their participation.
We surveyed allied health care professionals (social workers, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, registered dietitians, speech-language pathologists and pharmacists) on internal medicine, hematology-oncology, medical oncology and radiation oncology wards at 2 tertiary care hospitals in Hamilton, Ontario, from April 2013 to May 2014. We modified a validated questionnaire originally designed to assess barriers to discussing goals of care from the perspective of nurses, residents and staff physicians on hospital medical wards. Respondents rated the questionnaire items on a 7-point Likert scale.
Of the 47 allied health care professionals invited, 32 (68%) participated: 9 physiotherapists, 7 social workers, 6 occupational therapists, 4 registered dietitians, 3 pharmacists and 2 speech-language pathologists; in 1 case, the profession was unknown. The greatest perceived barriers to engaging in goals-of-care discussions were lack of patient decision-making capacity (mean rating 5.9 [standard error (SE) 0.3]), lack of awareness of patients' previous discussions with other team members (mean rating 5.7 [SE 0.3]) and family members' difficulty accepting a poor prognosis (mean rating 5.6 [SE 0.2]). Although the respondents felt it was most acceptable for staff physicians, residents and advanced practice nurses to exchange information and reach a final decision during goals-of-care discussions, they felt it was acceptable for a broader range of allied health care professionals to initiate discussions (mean rating 4.7-5.8) and to act as decision coaches (clarifying values, weighing options) with patients and families (mean rating 5.3-6.1).
Allied health care professionals are willing to initiate goals-of-care discussions and to act as a decision coach with seriously ill hospitalized patients and their families. By improving interprofessional collaboration, we can engage the entire health care team in this process.
专职医疗保健专业人员能够在与重症住院患者及其家属进行的医疗照护目标讨论中发挥重要作用。我们试图探究医院专职医疗保健专业人员对于其在医疗照护目标讨论中所扮演角色的看法,并找出他们参与其中的障碍。
2013年4月至2014年5月期间,我们对安大略省汉密尔顿市两家三级医疗医院内科、血液肿瘤学、医学肿瘤学和放射肿瘤学病房的专职医疗保健专业人员(社会工作者、物理治疗师、职业治疗师、注册营养师、言语语言病理学家和药剂师)进行了调查。我们修改了一份经过验证的问卷,该问卷最初旨在从医院内科病房护士、住院医师和 staff physicians 的角度评估讨论医疗照护目标的障碍。受访者以7分李克特量表对问卷项目进行评分。
在受邀的47名专职医疗保健专业人员中,32人(68%)参与了调查:9名物理治疗师、7名社会工作者、6名职业治疗师、4名注册营养师、3名药剂师和2名言语语言病理学家;有1例职业信息不明。参与医疗照护目标讨论的最大感知障碍是患者缺乏决策能力(平均评分5.9[标准误差(SE)0.3])、对患者之前与其他团队成员讨论情况缺乏了解(平均评分5.7[SE 0.3])以及家庭成员难以接受预后不良(平均评分5.6[SE 0.2])。尽管受访者认为在医疗照护目标讨论期间,staff physicians、住院医师和高级执业护士交流信息并达成最终决定是最可接受的,但他们认为更广泛的专职医疗保健专业人员发起讨论(平均评分4.7 - 5.8)以及作为决策指导者(阐明价值观、权衡选择)与患者及其家属互动(平均评分5.3 - 6.1)也是可接受的。
专职医疗保健专业人员愿意发起医疗照护目标讨论,并作为决策指导者与重症住院患者及其家属互动。通过改善跨专业协作,我们可以让整个医疗团队参与到这个过程中。