Ryee Siheon, Han Myung Joon
Department of Physics, KAIST, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea.
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 22;8(1):9559. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27731-4.
A systematic comparative study has been performed to better understand DFT+U (density functional theory + U) method. We examine the effect of choosing different double counting and exchange-correlation functionals. The calculated energy distribution and the Hund-J dependence of potential profile for representative configurations clearly show the different behaviors of each DFT+U formalism. In particular, adopting spin-dependent exchange-correlation functionals likely leads to undesirable magnetic solution. Our analyses are further highlighted by real material examples ranging from insulating oxides (MnO and NiO) to metallic magnetic systems (SrRuO and BaFeAs). The current work sheds new light on understanding DFT+U and provides a guideline to use the related methods.
为了更好地理解DFT+U(密度泛函理论+U)方法,已经进行了一项系统的比较研究。我们研究了选择不同的双计数和交换关联泛函的影响。对于代表性构型,计算得到的能量分布和势分布的洪德J依赖性清楚地显示了每种DFT+U形式的不同行为。特别是,采用自旋相关的交换关联泛函可能会导致不理想的磁解。从绝缘氧化物(MnO和NiO)到金属磁性系统(SrRuO和BaFeAs)的实际材料示例进一步突出了我们的分析。当前的工作为理解DFT+U提供了新的思路,并为使用相关方法提供了指导。