Turku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland; Department of Perioperative Services, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Department of Perioperative Services, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jul;121(1):281-290. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 May 8.
The highly selective α-agonist dexmedetomidine has become a popular sedative for neurointensive care patients. However, earlier studies have raised concern that dexmedetomidine might reduce cerebral blood flow without a concomitant decrease in metabolism. Here, we compared the effects of dexmedetomidine on the regional cerebral metabolic rate of glucose (CMR) with three commonly used anaesthetic drugs at equi-sedative doses.
One hundred and sixty healthy male subjects were randomised to EC for verbal command of dexmedetomidine (1.5 ng ml; n=40), propofol (1.7 μg ml; n=40), sevoflurane (0.9% end-tidal; n=40) or S-ketamine (0.75 μg ml; n=20) or placebo (n=20). Anaesthetics were administered using target-controlled infusion or vapouriser with end-tidal monitoring. F-labelled fluorodeoxyglucose was administered 20 min after commencement of anaesthetic administration, and high-resolution positron emission tomography with arterial blood activity samples was used to quantify absolute CMR for whole brain and 15 brain regions.
At the time of [F]fluorodeoxyglucose injection, 55% of dexmedetomidine, 45% of propofol, 85% of sevoflurane, 45% of S-ketamine, and 0% of placebo subjects were unresponsive. Whole brain CMR was 63%, 71%, 71%, and 96% of placebo in the dexmedetomidine, propofol, sevoflurane, and S-ketamine groups, respectively (P<0.001 between the groups). The lowest CMR was observed in nearly all brain regions with dexmedetomidine (P<0.05 compared with all other groups). With S-ketamine, CMR did not differ from placebo.
At equi-sedative doses in humans, potency in reducing CMR was dexmedetomidine>propofol>ketamine=placebo. These findings alleviate concerns for dexmedetomidine-induced vasoconstriction and cerebral ischaemia.
NCT02624401.
高度选择性的 α-激动剂右美托咪定已成为神经重症监护患者常用的镇静剂。然而,早期的研究表明,右美托咪定可能会降低脑血流而不伴随代谢的相应降低。在这里,我们比较了在等效镇静剂量下,右美托咪定与三种常用麻醉药物对局部脑葡萄糖代谢率(CMR)的影响。
160 名健康男性受试者被随机分为 EC 组接受右美托咪定(1.5ng/ml;n=40)、丙泊酚(1.7μg/ml;n=40)、七氟醚(0.9%呼气末;n=40)或 S-氯胺酮(0.75μg/ml;n=20)或安慰剂(n=20)。使用靶控输注或蒸发器进行麻醉,通过呼气末监测。麻醉开始后 20 分钟给予 F-标记的氟脱氧葡萄糖,使用动脉血活性样本的高分辨率正电子发射断层扫描来定量整个大脑和 15 个脑区的绝对 CMR。
在注射 [F]氟脱氧葡萄糖时,55%的右美托咪定、45%的丙泊酚、85%的七氟醚、45%的 S-氯胺酮和 0%的安慰剂受试者无反应。右美托咪定、丙泊酚、七氟醚和 S-氯胺酮组的全脑 CMR 分别为安慰剂的 63%、71%、71%和 96%(组间差异 P<0.001)。在几乎所有脑区,右美托咪定组的 CMR 均最低(与所有其他组相比,P<0.05)。与 S-氯胺酮相比,CMR 与安慰剂无差异。
在人类等效镇静剂量下,降低 CMR 的效力为右美托咪定>丙泊酚>氯胺酮=安慰剂。这些发现减轻了对右美托咪定引起的血管收缩和脑缺血的担忧。
NCT02624401。