Blizard Institute, Whitechapel, London, UK.
Blizard Institute, Whitechapel, London, UK.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Nov;18(11):e348-e354. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30359-1. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
The influenza epidemic of 1918 represented the greatest failure of medical science in the 20th century. Fortunately, research throughout subsequent years has been making amends. Some studies have applied RT-PCR to the tissue samples from that time, whereas others have reconstructed the pathogen in its virulent state. But the resurrection of the 1918 influenza virus leaves questions unanswered: although more virulent than contemporary H1N1 epidemic viruses in animal models, this increased virulence of the 1918 influenza virus is not sufficient to have been the sole cause of the high mortality rates recorded in humans during the epidemic. Thus, other hypotheses have been investigated. The immune history of the different age groups exposed at the time to the pandemic virus could be a factor, and the notion of original antigenic sin provides an explanation for the unusual pattern of deaths. The presence, or absence, of a cytokine storm in the lungs of young adults might also be involved. The time and location that the 1918 influenza pandemic first emerged from its avian reservoir is contentious, with arguments for China, Europe, and the USA, at various dates. Novel vaccines were tested during 1918, which are the precursors of the universal influenza vaccines that might offer protection in a future pandemic.
1918 年的流感大流行是 20 世纪医学科学最大的失败。幸运的是,此后多年的研究一直在弥补这一不足。一些研究将 RT-PCR 应用于当时的组织样本,而另一些研究则在其毒力状态下重建了病原体。但是,1918 年流感病毒的复活仍有一些问题没有答案:尽管在动物模型中比当代 H1N1 流行病毒更具毒性,但这种 1918 年流感病毒的毒性增加还不足以成为该病毒在大流行期间导致人类高死亡率的唯一原因。因此,人们研究了其他假设。当时暴露于大流行病毒的不同年龄组的免疫史可能是一个因素,而原始抗原性失误的概念为不寻常的死亡模式提供了一种解释。年轻人肺部是否存在细胞因子风暴也可能与此相关。1918 年流感大流行首次从其禽类宿主中出现的时间和地点存在争议,中国、欧洲和美国都有不同的说法。新型疫苗在 1918 年进行了测试,它们是通用流感疫苗的前身,这种疫苗可能为未来的大流行提供保护。