Suppr超能文献

质子泵抑制剂抵抗性胃食管反流的治疗:一项系统评价。

Treatment of PPI-resistant gastro-oesophageal reflux: A systematic review.

作者信息

Gallusi Giulia, Pontone Stefano

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Clinical Medicine "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.

Department of Surgical Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Arab J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jun;19(2):51-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ajg.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Jun 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Several studies have demonstrated the superiority of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) in resolving erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). However, this first line of treatment can fail to control symptoms in around 30% of cases, especially in the presence of non-erosive GORD. In situations where the first line of treatment fails, there is a lack of concordance regarding the best strategy to apply. This study presents a systematic review of the trials which have tested second-line treatments after PPI failure.

METHODS

The study was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. The systematic review included medical trials written in English which were published between 2000 and 2016 and were retrieved from PubMed and Scopus using the keywords 'PPI-resistant gastro-oesophageal reflux', 'alginate AND gastro-oesophageal reflux', 'hyaluronic acid AND gastro-oesophageal reflux', 'prokinetics AND gastro-oesophageal reflux', 'sucralfate AND gastro-oesophageal reflux' and 'baclofen AND gastro-oesophageal reflux'.

RESULTS

Ten randomised and non-randomised studies were included, which included 1515 patients of both sexes (mean age = 49.19 years, age range = 18-85, males = 700; 46.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

A personalised choice of the best treatment for PPI-resistant GORD should be based on the results of an upper endoscopy and pH/MII monitoring. For patients in situations where the first line of treatment fails, we encourage the execution of trials for testing double doses of PPIs against alternative medicaments.

摘要

背景与研究目的

多项研究已证实质子泵抑制剂(PPI)在解决糜烂性胃食管反流病(GORD)方面具有优越性。然而,这种一线治疗在约30%的病例中可能无法控制症状,尤其是在存在非糜烂性GORD的情况下。在一线治疗失败的情况下,对于应用何种最佳策略缺乏一致性意见。本研究对PPI治疗失败后测试二线治疗的试验进行了系统评价。

方法

本研究按照PRISMA声明进行。系统评价纳入了2000年至2016年间发表的、用英文撰写的医学试验,这些试验从PubMed和Scopus中检索,关键词为“PPI抵抗性胃食管反流”、“藻酸盐与胃食管反流”、“透明质酸与胃食管反流”、“促动力药与胃食管反流”、“硫糖铝与胃食管反流”以及“巴氯芬与胃食管反流”。

结果

纳入了10项随机和非随机研究,共1515例患者,男女均有(平均年龄=49.19岁,年龄范围=18 - 85岁,男性=700例;46.2%)。

结论

对于PPI抵抗性GORD的最佳治疗的个性化选择应基于上消化道内镜检查和pH/MII监测的结果。对于一线治疗失败的患者,我们鼓励开展试验,比较双倍剂量PPI与其他替代药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验