Tang Q, Tu Y Q, Chen J H, Lyu X J, Yan D D
Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China.
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2018 Jun 23;40(6):462-466. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2018.06.012.
To compare the curative effect of postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and radiation therapy (RT) alone on early-stage cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors. Clinical data of patients with early stage (ⅠB-ⅡA) cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between January 2008 and December 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Cervical squamous cell carcinoma patients with more than two intermediate-risk factors, including lymphatic vascular infiltration, depth of cervical stromal infiltration >1/2 cm or tumor size >4 cm, were screened. Among them, 80 patients were divided into the RT group, 137 patients were divided into the CCRT group. The survivals of these patients were analyzed. At the end of the follow-up period, a total of 22 patients were dead, one patient was alive with neoplasm. There were 23 patients who occurred recurrence/ metastasis, 14 of them were in the RT group and 9 were in the CCRT group. The 5-year progression free survival (PFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of the entire cohort were 89.9% and 89.8%, respectively. The 5-year PFS rate of RT group was 82.4%, the 5-year PFS rate of CCRT group was 94.1%, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (=0.013). The 5-year OS rate of RT group was 85.1%, the 5-year OS rate of CCRT group was 92.7%, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (=0.049). Univariate analysis showed that therapeutic modality was associated with the 5-year DFS and OS of early-stage cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors (<0.05). The results of multivariate analysis showed that therapeutic modality was an independent prognostic factor of favorable PFS (=3.741, 95% 1.506-9.289, =0.004) and OS (=2.754, 95%=1.143-6.637, =0.024). Neither of the two groups occurred severe anemia. However, the incidence of mild and moderate anemia in the CCRT group was higher than that of RT group (<0.001). The incidence of leukocytopenia severer than grade Ⅲ in the CCRT group was significantly higher than that of RT group (<0.001). However, the patients could recover quickly with the treatment of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Postoperative CCRT improves the survival of early stage cervical cancer patients with two or more intermediate-risk factors.
比较术后同步放化疗(CCRT)与单纯放疗(RT)对具有中危因素的早期宫颈癌患者的疗效。回顾性分析2008年1月至2011年12月在浙江省肿瘤医院接受根治性子宫切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术的早期(ⅠB-ⅡA期)宫颈癌患者的临床资料。筛选出具有两个以上中危因素的宫颈鳞状细胞癌患者,包括淋巴管浸润、宫颈间质浸润深度>1/2 cm或肿瘤大小>4 cm。其中,80例患者分为RT组,137例患者分为CCRT组。分析这些患者的生存情况。随访期末,共有22例患者死亡,1例患者带瘤生存。有23例患者发生复发/转移,其中RT组14例,CCRT组9例。整个队列的5年无进展生存率(PFS)和5年总生存率(OS)分别为89.9%和89.8%。RT组的5年PFS率为82.4%,CCRT组的5年PFS率为94.1%,两组之间的差异具有统计学意义(=0.013)。RT组的5年OS率为85.1%,CCRT组的5年OS率为92.7%,两组之间的差异具有统计学意义(=0.049)。单因素分析显示,治疗方式与具有中危因素的早期宫颈癌患者的5年DFS和OS相关(<0.05)。多因素分析结果显示,治疗方式是PFS(=3.741,95% 1.506-9.289,=0.004)和OS(=2.754,95%=1.143-6.637,=0.024)良好的独立预后因素。两组均未发生严重贫血。然而,CCRT组轻度和中度贫血的发生率高于RT组(<0.001)。CCRT组Ⅲ度以上白细胞减少的发生率明显高于RT组(<0.001)。然而,患者经粒细胞集落刺激因子治疗后可迅速恢复。术后CCRT可提高具有两个或更多中危因素的早期宫颈癌患者的生存率。