a Office of Standards and Guidelines Development, Division of Standards for Medical Devices , Pharmaceuticals and Medical Device Agency , Tokyo , JAPAN.
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018 Jul;15(7):497-504. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2018.1492376. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
Achieving regulatory convergence is important in providing safe and effective medical devices to patients in a timely manner. The use of standards set by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), may be an important tool for regulatory convergence. The International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF) published a survey and statements regarding the use of these standards in each IMDRF jurisdiction, which showed that each jurisdiction proactively uses these standards in its regulation.
This review describes the current situation by comparing the ISO and IEC standards with regulations in the European Union, the USA, and Japan on the basis of third-party certification in Japan.
Our results show that ISO and IEC standards may be important tools for regulatory convergence. However, the corresponding Technical Committees and publication editions vary in each regulation. Furthermore, there are cases in which inconsistencies between the requirements of these standards and regulation may arise. Considering this background, it is important that jurisdictions have common consensus about which Technical Committees are appropriate for the regulation of medical devices and the importance of involving standards development at an early stage to reflect regulatory opinions.
及时为患者提供安全有效的医疗器械,实现监管趋同非常重要。国际标准化组织(ISO)和国际电工委员会(IEC)制定的标准可能是监管趋同的重要工具。国际医疗器械监管者论坛(IMDRF)发布了一项调查和声明,说明每个 IMDRF 司法管辖区使用这些标准的情况,结果表明每个司法管辖区都在积极地将这些标准用于监管。
本综述通过比较日本第三方认证的欧盟、美国和日本的法规,描述了当前的情况。
我们的研究结果表明,ISO 和 IEC 标准可能是监管趋同的重要工具。然而,每个法规对应的技术委员会和发布版本都有所不同。此外,这些标准的要求与法规之间可能存在不一致的情况。考虑到这种背景,对于司法管辖区来说,就哪些技术委员会适合医疗器械监管达成共识,以及在早期阶段参与标准制定以反映监管意见非常重要。