Suppr超能文献

使用柯巴脂清漆和牙本质粘结衬层的汞合金修复体术后敏感度的频率比较

Comparison Of Frequency Of Post Operative Sensitivity In Amalgam Restorations Using Copal Varnish And Dentin Adhesive Liner.

作者信息

Saba Kiran, Maxood Anser, Abdullah Saeeda, Riaz Amna, Din Shahab Ud

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University, Islamabad, Pakistan.

出版信息

J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2018 Apr-Jun;30(2):163-166.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Micro leakage around the margins of a restoration is believed to be one of the main causes of postoperative sensitivity. Dental amalgam is a non-insulating material and has the potential to transfer heat and cold causing irritation of the pulp. Different dentin tubule sealers are used under amalgam restoration to compensate for this post-operative sensitivity. This study was conducted to compare the frequency of sensitivity in amalgam restorations using copal varnish and dentin adhesive liner (dentin bonding agent).

METHODS

A total of 60 patients of either gender, aged 18-40 years having class 1 carries in posterior teeth were included. Teeth with restorations, dentinal sensitivity and patients taking analgesic drugs for chronic pain conditions were excluded. The selected patients were placed randomly into Group A (copal varnish) & Group B (dentin adhesive liner), by using computer generated table of random numbers. Restored teeth were evaluated 1-month post operatively for sensitivity.

RESULTS

Mean age was 25.63±5.42 years. Out of 60 patients, 68.0% were females and 32.0% were males with a female to male ratio of 2:1. The mean post-operative pain score was 2.83±2.79 in Group A and in Group B, it was 1.43±2.14 with a p-value of 0.03. There was no pain on application of a cold stimulus in 14 (46.7%) patients in Group A (copal varnish) while in Group B (Dentin adhesive), no pain was seen in 23 (76.7%) patients with p-value of 0.02.

CONCLUSIONS

This study concluded that dentin adhesive liner (dentin bonding agent) is better than copal varnish in reducing postoperative sensitivity in amalgam restorations.

摘要

背景

修复体边缘的微渗漏被认为是术后敏感的主要原因之一。银汞合金是一种非绝缘材料,有可能传递热和冷,从而刺激牙髓。在银汞合金修复体下使用不同的牙本质小管封闭剂来补偿这种术后敏感性。本研究旨在比较使用珂罗酊清漆和牙本质粘结衬层(牙本质粘结剂)的银汞合金修复体中敏感的发生率。

方法

纳入60例年龄在18 - 40岁、后牙患有Ⅰ类龋的患者,无论性别。排除有修复体、牙本质敏感以及因慢性疼痛状况服用镇痛药的牙齿。通过使用计算机生成的随机数字表,将选定的患者随机分为A组(珂罗酊清漆)和B组(牙本质粘结衬层)。术后1个月对修复后的牙齿进行敏感性评估。

结果

平均年龄为25.63±5.42岁。60例患者中,68.0%为女性,32.0%为男性,男女比例为2:1。A组术后平均疼痛评分为2.83±2.79,B组为1.43±2.14,p值为0.03。A组(珂罗酊清漆)14例(46.7%)患者在冷刺激时无疼痛,而B组(牙本质粘结剂)23例(76.7%)患者无疼痛,p值为0.02。

结论

本研究得出结论,在降低银汞合金修复体的术后敏感性方面,牙本质粘结衬层(牙本质粘结剂)优于珂罗酊清漆。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验