• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用基于机载探测器的验证来检测 TomoTherapy 的剂量输送变化。

Detection of dose delivery variations on TomoTherapy using on-board detector based verification.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville VA, United States of America.

出版信息

Phys Med Biol. 2018 Jul 16;63(14):14NT02. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aacebb.

DOI:10.1088/1361-6560/aacebb
PMID:29938689
Abstract

A clinical case of delivery dose deviations on a TomoTherapy treatment was discovered during a patient specific treatment quality assurance (QA) verification. An in-house developed QA system, MCLogQA, for TomoTherapy has been implemented in our clinic for patient specific treatment QA. The MCLogQA system utilizes the log file and detector-based multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf opening time (LOT) to assess accuracy of treatment plan delivery. Recently, the MCLogQA system discovered  >10% dose deviation for a low dose/fraction treatment plan. To verify the adequacy of the MCLogQA result, a delivery quality assurance (DQA) plan was created and performed. The treatment plan was also transferred to a second TomoTherapy unit and planning system to investigate if the plan-delivery deviation was unit dependent. Further testing was carried out in phantom plans. MCLogQA showed MLC LOT was on average 2.4% higher than the planned LOT, resulting in 3.5% increase in mean dose, and 14% increase in dose to 1 cc volume of max dose in PTV. Independent DQA verification confirmed the MCLogQA result. For the transferred treatment plan delivery, the MCLogQA also showed an average increase of 6.6% in MLC LOT, resulting in increases in mean dose by 9.3% and dose to 1 cc volume of max dose in PTV by 16%. The inaccurate MLC LOT was a result of a poor latency model at very small LOT. Phantom testing confirmed low LOT will result in relatively large dosimetric variation, and detector-based MCLogQA will detect differences in planned and measured LOT. Accuracy in TomoTherapy treatment delivery can be susceptible to LOT uncertainty. Using MCLogQA for QA verification not only validates the treatment delivery, but also provides information on LOT variation and comprehensive dose distribution. This information can help decision making when large plan-delivery deviation occurs.

摘要

在患者特定的治疗质量保证(QA)验证过程中,发现了 TomoTherapy 治疗中的交付剂量偏差的临床病例。为了进行患者特定的治疗 QA,我们的诊所已经实施了一种内部开发的 TomoTherapy QA 系统,即 MCLogQA。该 MCLogQA 系统利用日志文件和基于探测器的多叶准直器(MLC)叶片开启时间(LOT)来评估治疗计划交付的准确性。最近,MCLogQA 系统发现低剂量/分次治疗计划的剂量偏差超过 10%。为了验证 MCLogQA 结果的充分性,创建并执行了交付质量保证(DQA)计划。还将治疗计划转移到第二台 TomoTherapy 设备和计划系统,以研究计划-交付偏差是否与设备相关。在体模计划中进行了进一步的测试。MCLogQA 显示 MLC LOT 平均比计划 LOT 高 2.4%,导致平均剂量增加 3.5%,PTV 中最大剂量的 1cc 体积剂量增加 14%。独立的 DQA 验证证实了 MCLogQA 的结果。对于转移的治疗计划交付,MCLogQA 还显示 MLC LOT 平均增加了 6.6%,导致平均剂量增加了 9.3%,PTV 中最大剂量的 1cc 体积剂量增加了 16%。不准确的 MLC LOT 是由于非常小的 LOT 时滞后模型不佳造成的。体模测试证实,低 LOT 将导致相对较大的剂量学变化,并且基于探测器的 MCLogQA 将检测计划 LOT 和测量 LOT 之间的差异。TomoTherapy 治疗交付的准确性可能容易受到 LOT 不确定性的影响。使用 MCLogQA 进行 QA 验证不仅验证了治疗交付,还提供了 LOT 变化和全面剂量分布的信息。当出现大的计划-交付偏差时,此信息有助于决策。

相似文献

1
Detection of dose delivery variations on TomoTherapy using on-board detector based verification.利用基于机载探测器的验证来检测 TomoTherapy 的剂量输送变化。
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Jul 16;63(14):14NT02. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aacebb.
2
Phantomless patient-specific TomoTherapy QA via delivery performance monitoring and a secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation.通过传输性能监测和二次蒙特卡洛剂量计算实现无模体患者特异性螺旋断层放疗质量保证。
Med Phys. 2014 Oct;41(10):101703. doi: 10.1118/1.4894721.
3
In air and in vivo measurement of the leaf open time in tomotherapy using the on-board detector pulse-by-pulse data.利用机载探测器逐脉冲数据,在空气和体内测量螺旋断层放疗中的叶片开启时间。
Med Phys. 2019 May;46(5):1963-1971. doi: 10.1002/mp.13459. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
4
Clinical implementation of an exit detector-based dose reconstruction tool for helical tomotherapy delivery quality assurance.基于出束探测器的剂量重建工具在螺旋断层调强放疗质量保证中的临床应用。
Med Phys. 2017 Oct;44(10):5457-5466. doi: 10.1002/mp.12484. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
5
Clinical implementation of Dosimetry Check™ for TomoTherapy delivery quality assurance.用于螺旋断层放射治疗(TomoTherapy)剂量验证的剂量测定检查(Dosimetry Check™)的临床应用。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Nov;19(6):193-199. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12480. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
6
Development of a novel delivery quality assurance system based on simultaneous verification of dose distribution and binary multi-leaf collimator opening in helical tomotherapy.基于螺旋断层放疗中剂量分布和二进制多叶准直器开口的同时验证的新型传输质量保证系统的开发。
Radiat Oncol. 2023 Nov 2;18(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s13014-023-02366-6.
7
Quantitative evaluation of 3D dosimetry for stereotactic volumetric-modulated arc delivery using COMPASS.使用COMPASS对立体定向容积调强弧形放疗的三维剂量学进行定量评估。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Jan 7;16(1):5128. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.5128.
8
TomoTherapy MLC verification using exit detector data.利用出口探测器数据对 TomoTherapy MLC 进行验证。
Med Phys. 2012 Jan;39(1):143-51. doi: 10.1118/1.3666762.
9
Validation of MLC leaf open time calculation methods for PSQA in adaptive radiotherapy with tomotherapy units.利用螺旋断层放疗设备对自适应放疗的 PSQA 进行 MLC 叶片开放时间计算方法的验证。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Oct;25(10):e14478. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14478. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
10
Dosimetric impacts of gantry angle misalignment on prostate cancer treatment using helical tomotherapy.机架角度失准对螺旋断层放疗前列腺癌治疗的剂量学影响。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Aug;7(4):287-93. doi: 10.1177/153303460800700403.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance of binary MLC using real-time optical sensor feedback system.使用实时光学传感器反馈系统的二进制 MLC 性能。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Nov;25(11):e14506. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14506. Epub 2024 Sep 9.