Zuercher Julia, Boes Katie M, Balogh Orsolya, Helms Alyssa B, Cecere Julie T
Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, United States.
Department of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, United States.
Front Vet Sci. 2021 May 13;8:660923. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.660923. eCollection 2021.
Accurate serum progesterone measurements for timing bitches during breeding management is critical for reproductive practice, especially as artificial insemination has become routine to facilitate breeding of animals that are geographically or temporally separated. To measure serum progesterone, chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) has replaced radioimmunoassay as the current standard in the bitch due to its high correlation and increased practicality. In January 2019, a colorimetric point-of-care (POC) immunoassay for quantitative in-clinic canine serum progesterone measurements in <30 min was released. This study provides an independent comparison of the POC (Catalyst One, IDEXX) to the current industry standard, CLIA (Immulite-2000, Siemens). To assess inter-assay imprecision of POC and agreement of the POC and CLIA results, 100 canine serum samples were analyzed on three analyzers (POC-1, POC-2, and CLIA), of which, 74 (POC-1) and 75 (POC-2) results were within POCs' reportable range of 0.2-20 ng/mL and included in the study. To assess intra-assay imprecision, pooled canine serum samples at low (L1), intermediate (L2), and high (L3) progesterone concentrations were analyzed ten times each on POC-1 and CLIA. Relative to CLIA, POC values showed good correlation (POC-1, = 0.9366; POC-2, = 0.9438, < 0.0001) and significant positive proportional bias at values >2 ng/mL. The POC inter-assay coefficients of variation (CVs) were 13.2% (0.2-2.9 ng/mL, 0.6-9.2 nmol/L, L1), 10.0% (3.0-9.9 ng/mL, 9.5-31.5 nmol/L, L2), 7.1% (10.0-20.0 ng/mL, 31.8-63.6 nmol/L, L3), and 11.2% (all samples). The intra-assay CVs for POC (L1, 15.3%; L2, 7.0%; L3, 4.7%) were higher than those for CLIA (L1, 5.89%; L2, 4.89%; L3, 3.44%). Based on the more rapid increase in serial serum progesterone concentrations in ovulating bitches and the greater imprecision of the POC, the clinical interpretations of serum progesterone measurements as they relate to canine breeding management should be made with caution.
在繁殖管理中,准确测定母犬血清孕酮水平对于生殖实践至关重要,尤其是在人工授精已成为促进地理或时间上分离的动物繁殖的常规手段的情况下。为了测定血清孕酮,化学发光免疫分析法(CLIA)已取代放射免疫分析法,成为目前母犬检测的标准方法,因为它具有高度相关性且实用性更强。2019年1月,一种用于在30分钟内定量检测临床犬血清孕酮的比色即时检验(POC)免疫分析法问世。本研究对POC(Catalyst One,IDEXX)与当前行业标准CLIA(Immulite-2000,西门子)进行了独立比较。为了评估POC的批间不精密度以及POC和CLIA结果的一致性,在三台分析仪(POC-1、POC-2和CLIA)上对100份犬血清样本进行了分析,其中74份(POC-1)和75份(POC-2)结果在POC可报告范围0.2 - 20 ng/mL内,并纳入研究。为了评估批内不精密度,对低(L1)、中(L2)、高(L3)孕酮浓度的混合犬血清样本在POC-