Department of Psychology.
Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018 Jul;86(7):569-583. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000324.
Over the last 10 years, there has been a dramatic increase in published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of brief mindfulness training (from single-session inductions to multisession interventions lasting up to 2 weeks), with some preliminary indications that these training programs may improve mental health outcomes, such as negative affectivity. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether brief mindfulness training reliably reduces negative affectivity.
PubMed, PsycINFO, and the Mindfulness Research Monthly Newsletter were systematically searched for brief mindfulness intervention RCTs assessing negative affectivity outcomes (e.g., depression, rumination, anxiety, stress). Sixty-five RCTs, including 5,489 participants predominantly without experience in meditation (64.64% female, mean age = 24.62), qualified for the meta-analytic review.
The meta-analysis revealed a small but significant effect of brief mindfulness training on reducing negative affectivity compared to control programs (g = .21, p < .001). The overall effect size was significantly moderated by participant characteristics: community samples (g = .41, p < .001) produced larger training effects compared to student samples (g = .14, p = .001; Qbetween p = .03). No significant effect size differences were found between clinical and nonclinical samples. However, when accounting for publication bias, the overall effect size of brief mindfulness training programs on negative affectivity was significantly reduced (g = .04).
Brief mindfulness training programs are increasingly popular approaches for reducing negative affectivity. This meta-analysis indicates that brief mindfulness training modestly reduces negative affectivity. Quantitative analyses indicated the presence of publication bias (i.e., unpublished null effect studies), highlighting the need to continue rigorous evaluation of brief mindfulness interventions. (PsycINFO Database Record
在过去的 10 年中,发表的简短正念训练(从单次诱导到持续长达 2 周的多节干预)的随机对照试验(RCT)数量急剧增加,一些初步迹象表明这些训练计划可能改善心理健康结果,例如负性情绪。本荟萃分析旨在评估简短正念训练是否能可靠地降低负性情绪。
系统检索了 PubMed、PsycINFO 和正念研究月刊,以查找评估负性情绪结果(如抑郁、沉思、焦虑、压力)的简短正念干预 RCT。有 65 项 RCT 符合荟萃分析审查标准,包括 5489 名主要没有冥想经验的参与者(64.64%为女性,平均年龄为 24.62 岁)。
与对照方案相比,简短正念训练对降低负性情绪的效果较小但具有统计学意义(g =.21,p <.001)。参与者特征显著调节了总体效应大小:与学生样本相比,社区样本(g =.41,p <.001)产生的训练效果更大(g =.14,p =.001;Q 之间 p =.03)。临床和非临床样本之间未发现显著的效应大小差异。然而,当考虑到出版偏倚时,简短正念训练计划对负性情绪的总体效果显著降低(g =.04)。
简短正念训练计划越来越受到关注,是降低负性情绪的一种方法。本荟萃分析表明,简短正念训练适度降低了负性情绪。定量分析表明存在出版偏倚(即,未发表的无效研究),这突出表明需要继续对简短正念干预进行严格评估。