• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交焦虑障碍正念生态瞬时干预的规范性预测因素:随机对照试验数据的机器学习分析

Prescriptive Predictors of Mindfulness Ecological Momentary Intervention for Social Anxiety Disorder: Machine Learning Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial Data.

作者信息

Zainal Nur Hani, Tan Hui Han, Hong Ryan Yee Shiun, Newman Michelle Gayle

机构信息

Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Ment Health. 2025 May 13;12:e67210. doi: 10.2196/67210.

DOI:10.2196/67210
PMID:40359509
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12117280/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shame and stigma often prevent individuals with social anxiety disorder (SAD) from seeking and attending costly and time-intensive psychotherapies, highlighting the importance of brief, low-cost, and scalable treatments. Creating prescriptive outcome prediction models is thus crucial for identifying which clients with SAD might gain the most from a unique scalable treatment option. Nevertheless, widely used classical regression methods might not optimally capture complex nonlinear associations and interactions.

OBJECTIVE

Precision medicine approaches were thus harnessed to examine prescriptive predictors of optimization to a 14-day fully self-guided mindfulness ecological momentary intervention (MEMI) over a self-monitoring app (SM).

METHODS

This study involved 191 participants who had probable SAD. Participants were randomly assigned to MEMI (n=96) or SM (n=95). They completed self-reports of symptoms, risk factors, treatment, and sociodemographics at baseline, posttreatment, and 1-month follow-up (1MFU). Machine learning (ML) models with 17 predictors of optimization to MEMI over SM, defined as a higher probability of SAD remission from MEMI at posttreatment and 1MFU, were evaluated. The Social Phobia Diagnostic Questionnaire, structurally equivalent to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual SAD criteria, was used to define remission. These ML models included random forest and support vector machines (radial basis function kernel) and 10-fold nested cross-validation that separated model training, minimal tuning in inner folds, and model testing in outer folds.

RESULTS

ML models outperformed logistic regression. The multivariable ML models using the 10 most important predictors achieved good performance, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AU-ROC) values ranging from .71 to .72 at posttreatment and 1MFU. These prerandomization and early-stage prescriptive predictors consistently identified which participants had the highest probability of optimization of MEMI over SM after 14 days and 6 weeks from baseline. Significant predictors included 4 strengths (higher trait mindfulness, lower SAD severity, presence of university education, no current psychotropic medication use), 2 weaknesses (higher generalized anxiety severity and clinician-diagnosed depression or anxiety disorder), and 1 sociodemographic variable (Chinese ethnicity). Emotion dysregulation and current psychotherapy predicted remission with inconsistent signs across time points.

CONCLUSIONS

The AU-ROC values indicated moderately meaningful effect sizes in identifying prescriptive predictors within multivariable models for clients with SAD. Focusing on the identified notable client strengths, weaknesses, and Chinese ethnicity may enhance our ability to predict future responses to scalable treatments. Estimating the likelihood of SAD remission with a "prescriptive predictor calculator" for each client may help clinicians and policymakers allocate scarce treatment resources effectively. Clients with high remission probability may benefit from receiving the MEMI as a vigilant waitlist strategy before intensive therapist-led psychotherapy. These efforts may aid in creating actionable treatment selection tools to optimize care for clients with SAD in routine health care settings that use stratified care principles.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

OSF Registries 10.17605/OSF.IO/M3KXZ; https://osf.io/m3kxz.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aa1/12117280/e623c2bdf702/mental_v12i1e67210_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aa1/12117280/b289258f6f20/mental_v12i1e67210_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aa1/12117280/50cd2a2f4c19/mental_v12i1e67210_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aa1/12117280/e623c2bdf702/mental_v12i1e67210_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aa1/12117280/b289258f6f20/mental_v12i1e67210_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aa1/12117280/50cd2a2f4c19/mental_v12i1e67210_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aa1/12117280/e623c2bdf702/mental_v12i1e67210_fig3.jpg
摘要

背景

羞耻感和污名化常常使社交焦虑障碍(SAD)患者不愿寻求并接受成本高昂且耗时的心理治疗,这凸显了简短、低成本且可扩展治疗方法的重要性。因此,创建规范性结果预测模型对于确定哪些SAD患者可能从独特的可扩展治疗方案中获益最大至关重要。然而,广泛使用的经典回归方法可能无法最佳地捕捉复杂的非线性关联和相互作用。

目的

因此,利用精准医学方法来研究通过一款自我监测应用程序(SM)进行为期14天的完全自我引导的正念生态瞬时干预(MEMI)实现优化的规范性预测因素。

方法

本研究纳入了191名可能患有SAD的参与者。参与者被随机分配至MEMI组(n = 96)或SM组(n = 95)。他们在基线、治疗后及1个月随访(1MFU)时完成了症状、风险因素、治疗及社会人口统计学的自我报告。评估了具有17个预测MEMI优于SM的优化预测因素的机器学习(ML)模型,优化定义为治疗后及1MFU时MEMI实现SAD缓解的更高概率。使用与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》SAD标准结构等效的社交恐惧症诊断问卷来定义缓解情况。这些ML模型包括随机森林和支持向量机(径向基函数核)以及10折嵌套交叉验证,该验证将模型训练、内折中的最小调优以及外折中的模型测试区分开来。

结果

ML模型优于逻辑回归。使用10个最重要预测因素的多变量ML模型表现良好,治疗后及1MFU时受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AU - ROC)值在0.71至0.72之间。这些随机分组前和早期的规范性预测因素始终能确定哪些参与者在自基线起14天和6周后MEMI优于SM的概率最高。显著的预测因素包括4个优势(更高的特质正念、更低的SAD严重程度、拥有大学学历、目前未使用精神药物)、2个劣势(更高的广泛性焦虑严重程度以及临床医生诊断的抑郁或焦虑障碍)以及1个社会人口统计学变量(华裔)。情绪失调和当前的心理治疗在不同时间点对缓解的预测具有不一致的符号。

结论

AU - ROC值表明在为SAD患者的多变量模型中识别规范性预测因素时具有适度有意义的效应大小。关注已确定的显著客户优势、劣势和华裔可能会增强我们预测对可扩展治疗未来反应的能力。为每个客户使用“规范性预测因素计算器”估计SAD缓解的可能性可能有助于临床医生和政策制定者有效分配稀缺的治疗资源。缓解概率高的客户可能会受益于在由治疗师主导的强化心理治疗之前将MEMI作为一种警惕的等待名单策略。这些努力可能有助于创建可操作的治疗选择工具,以在使用分层护理原则的常规医疗保健环境中优化对SAD患者的护理。

试验注册

OSF注册库10.17605/OSF.IO/M3KXZ;https://osf.io/m3kxz。

相似文献

1
Prescriptive Predictors of Mindfulness Ecological Momentary Intervention for Social Anxiety Disorder: Machine Learning Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial Data.社交焦虑障碍正念生态瞬时干预的规范性预测因素:随机对照试验数据的机器学习分析
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 May 13;12:e67210. doi: 10.2196/67210.
2
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
4
Psychological therapies for women who experience intimate partner violence.针对遭受亲密伴侣暴力的女性的心理疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 1;7(7):CD013017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013017.pub2.
5
Psychological therapies for treatment-resistant depression in adults.成人难治性抑郁症的心理治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 14;5(5):CD010558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010558.pub2.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
Pharmacotherapy for anxiety and comorbid alcohol use disorders.焦虑症合并酒精使用障碍的药物治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 20;1(1):CD007505. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007505.pub2.
8
Therapist-supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults.成人焦虑症的治疗师辅助互联网认知行为疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 5(3):CD011565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011565.
9
Therapist-supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults.治疗师支持的针对成人焦虑症的互联网认知行为疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 12;3(3):CD011565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011565.pub2.
10
Testing the Efficacy of a Brief, Self-Guided Mindfulness Ecological Momentary Intervention on Emotion Regulation and Self-Compassion in Social Anxiety Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial.测试简短、自我引导的正念生态即时干预对社交焦虑障碍情绪调节和自我同情的疗效:随机对照试验。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Apr 19;11:e53712. doi: 10.2196/53712.

本文引用的文献

1
Do the effects of internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy (i-CBT) last after a year and beyond? A meta-analysis of 154 randomized controlled trials (RCTs).互联网 delivered 认知行为疗法 (i-CBT) 的效果在一年后及以后还会持续吗?对 154 项随机对照试验 (RCTs) 的荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2024 Dec;114:102518. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102518. Epub 2024 Nov 16.
2
Working mechanisms of the use and acceptability of ecological momentary interventions: a realist evaluation of a guided self-help ecological momentary intervention targeting self-esteem.使用和接受生态瞬间干预措施的工作机制:针对自尊的引导自助生态瞬间干预措施的实际评估。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 19;24(1):1633. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19143-z.
3
A comparison of random forest-based missing imputation methods for covariates in propensity score analysis.
倾向得分分析中基于随机森林的协变量缺失值插补方法比较
Psychol Methods. 2024 Jun 13. doi: 10.1037/met0000676.
4
Covariate adjustment in randomized controlled trials: General concepts and practical considerations.随机对照试验中的协变量调整:一般概念和实际考虑。
Clin Trials. 2024 Aug;21(4):399-411. doi: 10.1177/17407745241251568. Epub 2024 Jun 2.
5
Examining the Effects of a Brief, Fully Self-Guided Mindfulness Ecological Momentary Intervention on Empathy and Theory-of-Mind for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial.考察简短、完全自主的正念生态瞬间干预对广泛性焦虑障碍共情和心理理论的影响:随机对照试验。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 May 24;11:e54412. doi: 10.2196/54412.
6
Is a brief mindfulness ecological momentary intervention more efficacious than a self-monitoring app for social anxiety disorder? A randomized controlled trial.简短正念生态瞬间干预是否比自我监测应用程序更能有效治疗社交焦虑障碍?一项随机对照试验。
J Anxiety Disord. 2024 Jun;104:102858. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102858. Epub 2024 Mar 24.
7
Testing the Efficacy of a Brief, Self-Guided Mindfulness Ecological Momentary Intervention on Emotion Regulation and Self-Compassion in Social Anxiety Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial.测试简短、自我引导的正念生态即时干预对社交焦虑障碍情绪调节和自我同情的疗效:随机对照试验。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Apr 19;11:e53712. doi: 10.2196/53712.
8
A comparative study in class imbalance mitigation when working with physiological signals.处理生理信号时缓解类别不平衡的比较研究。
Front Digit Health. 2024 Mar 26;6:1377165. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1377165. eCollection 2024.
9
Validity and reliability of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale Short Form in Indonesian non-clinical population.印度尼西亚非临床人群中情绪调节困难量表简版的效度和信度
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 25;15:1380354. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1380354. eCollection 2024.
10
Research Centers Collaborative Network Workshop on Digital Health Approaches to Research in Aging.衰老研究数字健康方法研究中心协作网络研讨会
Innov Aging. 2024 Feb 8;8(2):igae012. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igae012. eCollection 2024.