Perez David L, Keshavan Matcheri S, Scharf Jeremiah M, Boes Aaron D, Price Bruce H
From the Department of Neurology, Behavioral Neurology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (DLP, BHP); the Department of Psychiatry, Neuropsychiatry Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (DLP); the Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (MSK); the Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (JMS); the Department of Neurology, Division of Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston (JMS); the Departments of Pediatrics, Neurology, and Psychiatry, University of Iowa Health Care, Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa (ADB); and the Department of Neurology, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Mass. (BHP).
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2018 Fall;30(4):271-278. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.17100200. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
Neurology and psychiatry share common historical origins and rely on similar tools to study brain disorders. Yet the practical integration of medical and scientific approaches across these clinical neurosciences remains elusive. Although much has been written about the need to incorporate emerging systems-level, cellular-molecular, and genetic-epigenetic advances into a science of mind for psychiatric disorders, less attention has been given to applying clinical neuroscience principles to conceptualize neurologic conditions with an integrated neurobio-psycho-social approach. In this perspective article, the authors briefly outline the historically interwoven and complicated relationship between neurology and psychiatry. Through a series of vignettes, the authors then illustrate how some traditional psychiatric conditions are being reconceptualized in part as disorders of neurodevelopment and awareness. They emphasize the intersection of neurology and psychiatry by highlighting conditions that cut across traditional diagnostic boundaries. The authors argue that the divide between neurology and psychiatry can be narrowed by moving from lesion-based toward circuit-based understandings of neuropsychiatric disorders, from unidirectional toward bidirectional models of brain-behavior relationships, from exclusive reliance on categorical diagnoses toward transdiagnostic dimensional perspectives, and from silo-based research and treatments toward interdisciplinary approaches. The time is ripe for neurologists and psychiatrists to implement an integrated clinical neuroscience approach to the assessment and management of brain disorders. The subspecialty of behavioral neurology & neuropsychiatry is poised to lead the next generation of clinicians to merge brain science with psychological and social-cultural factors. These efforts will catalyze translational research, revitalize training programs, and advance the development of impactful patient-centered treatments.
神经病学和精神病学有着共同的历史渊源,并且依靠相似的工具来研究脑部疾病。然而,在这些临床神经科学中,医学和科学方法的实际整合仍然难以实现。尽管已经有很多关于将新兴的系统层面、细胞分子层面以及基因表观遗传学进展纳入精神疾病心智科学的必要性的论述,但对于运用临床神经科学原理,以综合的神经生物 - 心理 - 社会方法来概念化神经疾病,却较少有人关注。在这篇观点文章中,作者简要概述了神经病学和精神病学之间历史上相互交织且复杂的关系。然后,通过一系列案例,作者阐述了一些传统的精神疾病如何在一定程度上被重新概念化为神经发育和意识障碍。他们通过强调跨越传统诊断界限的病症来突出神经病学和精神病学的交叉点。作者认为,从基于病变的神经精神疾病理解转向基于回路的理解,从脑 - 行为关系的单向模型转向双向模型,从单纯依赖分类诊断转向跨诊断维度视角,以及从各自为政的研究和治疗转向跨学科方法,可以缩小神经病学和精神病学之间的差距。神经病学家和精神病学家采用综合临床神经科学方法来评估和管理脑部疾病的时机已经成熟。行为神经病学与神经精神病学亚专业有望引领下一代临床医生将脑科学与心理及社会文化因素融合起来。这些努力将推动转化研究,振兴培训项目,并促进以患者为中心的有效治疗方法的发展。