Allgemeine und Experimentelle Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Graduate School of Systemic Neurosciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
PLoS Biol. 2018 Jun 25;16(6):e2006548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006548. eCollection 2018 Jun.
The premotor theory of attention postulates that spatial attention arises from the activation of saccade areas and that the deployment of attention is the consequence of motor programming. Yet attentional and oculomotor processes have been shown to be dissociable at the neuronal level in covert attention tasks. To investigate a potential dissociation at the behavioral level, we instructed human participants to move their eyes (saccade) towards 1 of 2 nearby, competing saccade targets. The spatial distribution of visual attention was determined using oriented visual stimuli presented either at the target locations, between them, or at several other equidistant locations. Results demonstrate that accurate saccades towards one of the targets were associated with presaccadic enhancement of visual sensitivity at the respective saccade endpoint compared to the nonsaccaded target location. In contrast, averaging saccades, landing between the 2 targets, were not associated with attentional facilitation at the saccade endpoint. Rather, attention before averaging saccades was equally deployed at the 2 target locations. Taken together, our results reveal that visual attention is not obligatorily coupled to the endpoint of a subsequent saccade. Rather, our results suggest that the oculomotor program depends on the state of attentional selection before saccade onset and that saccade averaging arises from unresolved attentional selection.
注意的前运动理论假定空间注意源于扫视区域的激活,而注意的部署是运动编程的结果。然而,在隐蔽注意任务中,已经证明注意和眼动过程在神经元水平上是可分离的。为了在行为水平上研究潜在的分离,我们指示人类参与者将眼睛(扫视)转向 2 个附近的竞争扫视目标中的 1 个。使用在目标位置、它们之间或其他几个等距位置呈现的定向视觉刺激来确定视觉注意力的空间分布。结果表明,与非扫视目标位置相比,准确的扫视朝向其中一个目标与在各自的扫视终点处的预扫视视觉敏感性增强相关。相比之下,平均扫视,落在两个目标之间,在扫视终点处没有注意促进。相反,在进行平均扫视之前,注意力在两个目标位置上同样分布。总之,我们的结果表明,视觉注意力不一定与后续扫视的终点相关。相反,我们的结果表明,眼动程序取决于扫视开始前注意选择的状态,并且扫视平均化来自未解决的注意选择。