• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善全方位的预先医疗照护计划行为改变和行动领域:PREPARE 随机试验。

Improving a Full Range of Advance Care Planning Behavior Change and Action Domains: The PREPARE Randomized Trial.

机构信息

Eastern Colorado VA Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Denver, Colorado, USA; Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Oct;56(4):575-581.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.06.007
PMID:29940209
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6138565/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Advance care planning (ACP) engagement includes a wide range of behaviors and actions related to discussions and documentation, yet few ACP intervention studies measure the full process.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to compare the effects of an easy-to-read advance directive (AD) versus an ACP web site plus the AD (PREPARE + AD) on Behavior Change Processes and Actions, including discussions and documentation.

METHODS

Secondary data were from a completed ACP trial. Participants were primary care patients, ≥60 years old, with two comorbidities. We used the validated ACP Engagement Survey to examine six-month change in subscales measuring Behavior Change Processes (knowledge, contemplation, self-efficacy, readiness) and Actions (decision makers, quality of life, flexibility for decision makers, asking clinicians questions), specifically related to discussions and documentation. We used adjusted mixed-effects linear models to compare mean change and engagement over time.

RESULTS

Compared to the AD-only, PREPARE + AD resulted in greater increases in all Behavior Change Processes subscales and Actions related to decision makers, quality of life, and flexibility (all P-values ≤0.005). Both interventions significantly increased the proportion of participants who engaged in ACP discussions (PREPARE + AD, 99.5%; AD-only, 93.3%) and documentation (PREPARE + AD, 99.5%; AD-only, 90.4%), with greater increases for PREPARE + AD (all P-values <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both PREPARE plus an easy-to-read AD and an AD-only markedly increased ACP engagement in a full range of ACP behaviors, including discussions and documentation, and engagement was nearly 100% with PREPARE + AD. Future ACP studies should examine a full range of ACP behaviors beyond ADs and the impact of PREPARE and easy-to-read AD implementation on health care systems.

摘要

背景

预先医疗指示(ACP)的参与包括与讨论和文件记录相关的广泛行为和活动,但很少有 ACP 干预研究测量整个过程。

目的

本研究的目的是比较易于阅读的预先医疗指示(AD)与 ACP 网站加 AD(PREPARE+AD)对行为改变过程和行为的影响,包括讨论和文件记录。

方法

次要数据来自已完成的 ACP 试验。参与者为≥60 岁、有两种合并症的初级保健患者。我们使用经过验证的 ACP 参与调查来检查 6 个月时在衡量行为改变过程(知识、思考、自我效能、准备)和行为(决策者、生活质量、决策者的灵活性、向临床医生提问)的子量表上的变化,具体涉及讨论和文件记录。我们使用调整后的混合效应线性模型来比较随时间的平均变化和参与度。

结果

与仅 AD 相比,PREPARE+AD 导致所有行为改变过程子量表以及与决策者、生活质量和灵活性相关的行为(所有 P 值≤0.005)的增加更大。两种干预措施都显著增加了参与 ACP 讨论(PREPARE+AD,99.5%;AD 仅,93.3%)和文件记录(PREPARE+AD,99.5%;AD 仅,90.4%)的参与者比例,PREPARE+AD 的增加更大(所有 P 值均<0.001)。

结论

PREPARE 加易于阅读的 AD 和仅 AD 都显著增加了 ACP 的广泛行为参与度,包括讨论和文件记录,PREPARE+AD 的参与度几乎达到 100%。未来的 ACP 研究应检查除 AD 之外的 ACP 行为的全范围,并检查 PREPARE 和易于阅读的 AD 实施对医疗保健系统的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0277/6138565/215231ece2a6/nihms977472f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0277/6138565/206e3d138fd3/nihms977472f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0277/6138565/215231ece2a6/nihms977472f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0277/6138565/206e3d138fd3/nihms977472f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0277/6138565/215231ece2a6/nihms977472f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving a Full Range of Advance Care Planning Behavior Change and Action Domains: The PREPARE Randomized Trial.改善全方位的预先医疗照护计划行为改变和行动领域:PREPARE 随机试验。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Oct;56(4):575-581.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
2
Empowering Older Adults to Discuss Advance Care Planning During Clinical Visits: The PREPARE Randomized Trial.赋权老年人在临床就诊期间讨论预立医疗照护计划:PREPARE 随机试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jun;68(6):1210-1217. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16405. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
3
The advance care planning PREPARE study among older Veterans with serious and chronic illness: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.针对患有严重慢性病的老年退伍军人的预先护理计划PREPARE研究:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2015 Dec 12;16:570. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1055-9.
4
Effect of the PREPARE Website vs an Easy-to-Read Advance Directive on Advance Care Planning Documentation and Engagement Among Veterans: A Randomized Clinical Trial.PREPARE网站与易读的预立医疗指示对退伍军人预立医疗照护计划文件记录及参与度的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;177(8):1102-1109. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1607.
5
The PREPARE for Your Care program increases advance care planning engagement among diverse older adults with cancer.PREPARE 关爱计划提高了不同癌症老年患者的预先护理计划参与度。
Cancer. 2021 Oct 1;127(19):3631-3639. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33676. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
6
Improving advance care planning for English-speaking and Spanish-speaking older adults: study protocol for the PREPARE randomised controlled trial.改善英语和西班牙语老年人群的预立医疗照护计划:PREPARE随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 11;6(7):e011705. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011705.
7
Effectiveness of Advance Care Planning Group Visits Among Older Adults in Primary Care.在初级保健中老年患者中,预先医疗照护计划团体访视的效果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Oct;68(10):2382-2389. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16694. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
8
Engaging Diverse English- and Spanish-Speaking Older Adults in Advance Care Planning: The PREPARE Randomized Clinical Trial.参与式准备计划研究:一项针对不同英语和西班牙语老年人群体的随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1616-1625. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4657.
9
A novel website to prepare diverse older adults for decision making and advance care planning: a pilot study.一个帮助不同老年人群体进行决策和预先护理计划准备的新型网站:一项试点研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Apr;47(4):674-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.05.023. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
10
Empowering patients with the PREPARE advance care planning program results in reciprocal clinician communication.赋能患者参与 PREPARE 预先医疗照护计划可促进医患间的双向沟通。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Feb;70(2):585-591. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17540. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Translation, Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey for Korean Older People.韩国老年人预立医疗照护计划参与度调查问卷的翻译、文化调适与效度验证
Int J Older People Nurs. 2025 Jul;20(4):e70039. doi: 10.1111/opn.70039.
2
Tools for tomorrow: a scoping review of patient-facing tools for advance care planning.面向未来的工具:对用于预先医疗护理计划的患者端工具的范围综述
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Jun 24;18:26323524241263108. doi: 10.1177/26323524241263108. eCollection 2024.
3
Systems for electronic documentation and sharing of advance care planning preferences: a scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Feasibility of a Video-Based Advance Care Planning Website to Facilitate Group Visits among Diverse Adults from a Safety-Net Health System.基于视频的预先医疗照护计划网站对于促进来自医疗保障体系的多样化成年人小组访问的可行性。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Jun;21(6):853-856. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0476. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
2
Advance Care Planning Documentation Practices and Accessibility in the Electronic Health Record: Implications for Patient Safety.电子健康记录中的预先医疗指示文件记录实践和可及性:对患者安全的影响。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Feb;55(2):256-264. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.09.018. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
3
Outcomes That Define Successful Advance Care Planning: A Delphi Panel Consensus.
电子文档系统与预先医疗计划偏好的共享:一项范围综述
Prog Palliat Care. 2024 Apr 26;32(3):149-159. doi: 10.1080/09699260.2024.2339106. eCollection 2024.
4
A Mixed-Methods Comparison of Interventions to Increase Advance Care Planning.混合方法比较干预措施以增加预先护理计划。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2024 Mar-Apr;37(2):215-227. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230187R2.
5
Measuring decision aid effectiveness for end-of-life care: A systematic review.衡量临终关怀决策辅助工具的有效性:一项系统综述。
PEC Innov. 2024 Mar 13;4:100273. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100273. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Reliability and Validation Study of Advance Care Planning Practice Scale among Health and Social Care Professionals.健康与社会护理专业人员中预先护理计划实践量表的信效度研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 15;12(2):200. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020200.
7
Complex advance care planning intervention in general practice (ACP-GP): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.全科医疗中的复杂预立医疗计划干预措施(ACP-GP):一项整群随机对照试验。
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Jan 25;74(739):e78-e87. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0022. Print 2024 Feb.
8
The Web-Based Advance Care Planning Program "Explore Your Preferences for Treatment and Care": Development, Pilot Study, and Before-and-After Evaluation.基于网络的预先医疗照护计划“探索您对治疗和护理的偏好”:开发、试点研究及前后评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Dec 2;24(12):e38561. doi: 10.2196/38561.
9
Publicly Available, Interactive Web-Based Tools to Support Advance Care Planning: Systematic Review.公开可用的交互式网络工具以支持预先护理计划:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 20;24(4):e33320. doi: 10.2196/33320.
10
Complex advance care planning interventions for chronic serious illness: how do they work: a scoping review.针对慢性重症疾病的复杂预立医疗计划干预措施:其作用机制如何:一项范围综述
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 Oct 5;12(e3):e441-50. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003310.
定义成功的预先医疗照护计划的结果:德尔菲小组共识。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Feb;55(2):245-255.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.08.025. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
4
Effect of the PREPARE Website vs an Easy-to-Read Advance Directive on Advance Care Planning Documentation and Engagement Among Veterans: A Randomized Clinical Trial.PREPARE网站与易读的预立医疗指示对退伍军人预立医疗照护计划文件记录及参与度的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;177(8):1102-1109. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1607.
5
Defining Advance Care Planning for Adults: A Consensus Definition From a Multidisciplinary Delphi Panel.为成年人定义预先护理计划:多学科德尔菲专家组的共识定义
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 May;53(5):821-832.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.331. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
6
Measuring Advance Care Planning: Optimizing the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey.衡量预先护理计划:优化预先护理计划参与度调查。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Apr;53(4):669-681.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.10.367. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
7
Improving advance care planning for English-speaking and Spanish-speaking older adults: study protocol for the PREPARE randomised controlled trial.改善英语和西班牙语老年人群的预立医疗照护计划:PREPARE随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 11;6(7):e011705. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011705.
8
Measuring engagement in advance care planning: a cross-sectional multicentre feasibility study.测量预先医疗照护计划的参与度:一项跨中心的可行性研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 23;6(6):e010375. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010375.
9
Advance Care Planning Meets Group Medical Visits: The Feasibility of Promoting Conversations.预先医疗照护计划与团体医疗访视相结合:促进对话的可行性。
Ann Fam Med. 2016 Mar;14(2):125-32. doi: 10.1370/afm.1906.
10
Health behavior change in advance care planning: an agent-based model.预先护理计划中的健康行为改变:基于主体的模型。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 29;16:193. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2872-9.