• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自体造血干细胞移植在多发性骨髓瘤患者疾病缓解期与复发时的疗效比较。

Comparison of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation performed in tandem and in disease relapse in multiple myeloma patients.

机构信息

Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Neoplasma. 2018 Nov 15;65(6):952-957. doi: 10.4149/neo_2018_170511N346. Epub 2018 Jun 17.

DOI:10.4149/neo_2018_170511N346
PMID:29940749
Abstract

Multiple myeloma is a malignant hemato-oncological malignancy that affects up to 600 people in the Czech Republic every year. Treatment options are under constant improvement and the autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (Tx) remains a part of treatment protocols. Despite modern drug administration, the autologous Tx keeps its irreplaceable position and when ensuring two autologous Tx, the studies confirm a survival time more than twice as long as in non-transplant patients. However, there are no standardized procedures specifying the period in between the transplantations in more detail. Within our group, we compared the total of 66 patients who were administered a double transplant. One group underwent both planned tandem autologous Tx within a median of six months and mostly achieved just partial remission (PR) and less after the first transplant and out of disease progression. The other group only underwent the second Tx within a median of up to 14 months during a progression period or disease relapse. Both groups were comparable as far as basic parameters are concerned (age, type of induction therapy and cytogenetic risk). A significantly better treatment free survival (TFX) and overall survival (OS) were observed in the group where tandem Tx was administered. TFS was 18 months and median OS was not reached for the group of patients who received tandem Tx, while TFS was 10 months (p=0.04) and median OS was 57 months (p=0.005) for those who received delayed second Tx. In the group of patients who received second Tx during relapse, we observed that TFS and OS were shorter in those with a higher paraprotein level, thus suggesting the potential role of paraprotein level as a prognostic marker. The TFS in the subgroup with a high initial level was 4 months vs. 11 months (p=0.0016) and OS 44 months vs. 65 months (p=0.03).

摘要

多发性骨髓瘤是一种恶性血液肿瘤,每年在捷克影响多达 600 人。治疗方案在不断改进,自体造血细胞移植(Tx)仍然是治疗方案的一部分。尽管使用了现代药物,但自体 Tx 仍然具有不可替代的地位,两次自体 Tx 可确保患者的生存时间比非移植患者长两倍以上。然而,目前尚无标准化程序来更详细地规定两次移植之间的时间间隔。在我们的研究组中,我们比较了 66 名接受双移植的患者。一组在中位时间为 6 个月内进行了两次计划的串联自体 Tx,大多数患者仅获得部分缓解(PR),第一次移植后缓解率较低,且疾病进展后缓解率更低。另一组仅在进展期或疾病复发期间在中位时间长达 14 个月内进行第二次 Tx。两组在基本参数方面(年龄、诱导治疗类型和细胞遗传学风险)具有可比性。在接受串联 Tx 的组中观察到显著更好的无治疗生存期(TFX)和总生存期(OS)。接受串联 Tx 的患者组 TFS 为 18 个月,中位 OS 未达到,而接受延迟第二次 Tx 的患者组 TFS 为 10 个月(p=0.04),中位 OS 为 57 个月(p=0.005)。在接受第二次 Tx 治疗复发的患者组中,我们观察到那些具有较高的 M 蛋白水平的患者 TFS 和 OS 更短,这表明 M 蛋白水平可能作为预后标志物。初始水平较高的亚组 TFS 为 4 个月,11 个月(p=0.0016),OS 为 44 个月,65 个月(p=0.03)。

相似文献

1
Comparison of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation performed in tandem and in disease relapse in multiple myeloma patients.自体造血干细胞移植在多发性骨髓瘤患者疾病缓解期与复发时的疗效比较。
Neoplasma. 2018 Nov 15;65(6):952-957. doi: 10.4149/neo_2018_170511N346. Epub 2018 Jun 17.
2
Autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma: a GITMO retrospective analysis on 290 patients. Gruppo Italiano Trapianti di Midollo Osseo.多发性骨髓瘤的自体移植:意大利骨髓移植研究组对290例患者的回顾性分析
Haematologica. 1999 Sep;84(9):844-52.
3
Transplantation as salvage therapy for high-risk patients with myeloma in relapse.移植作为复发的高危骨髓瘤患者的挽救性治疗。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002 Dec;30(12):873-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703715.
4
Autologous stem cell transplantation in first remission is associated with better progression-free survival in multiple myeloma.自体干细胞移植在第一次缓解期与多发性骨髓瘤患者更好的无进展生存期相关。
Ann Hematol. 2018 Oct;97(10):1869-1877. doi: 10.1007/s00277-018-3370-1. Epub 2018 May 21.
5
[Efficacy and Influencing Factors of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Retrospective Analysis].[自体造血干细胞移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤的疗效及影响因素:回顾性分析]
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Oct;26(5):1414-1419. doi: 10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2018.05.026.
6
Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with tandem auto-allogeneic stem cell transplant have better overall survival with similar outcomes at time of relapse compared to patients who received autologous transplant only.新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤患者接受串联自体同源干细胞移植治疗与仅接受自体移植的患者相比,总体生存更好,复发时的结果相似。
Clin Transplant. 2020 Dec;34(12):e14099. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14099. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
7
Long-term results in multiple myeloma after high-dose melphalan and autologous transplantation according to response categories in the era of old drugs.在旧药时代,根据反应类别,大剂量美法仑和自体移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤的长期结果。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2014 Apr;14(2):148-54. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2013.11.009. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
8
Outcome of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in refractory multiple myeloma.难治性多发性骨髓瘤自体造血干细胞移植的结果
Cancer. 2017 Sep 15;123(18):3568-3575. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30770. Epub 2017 May 17.
9
Second autologous or allogeneic transplantation after the failure of first autograft in patients with multiple myeloma.多发性骨髓瘤患者首次自体移植失败后的第二次自体或异基因移植。
Cancer. 2006 Mar 1;106(5):1084-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21700.
10
Complete remission status before autologous stem cell transplantation is an important prognostic factor in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing upfront single autologous transplantation.对于接受初次单次自体移植的多发性骨髓瘤患者,自体干细胞移植前的完全缓解状态是一个重要的预后因素。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009 Apr;15(4):463-70. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.12.512.

引用本文的文献

1
Tandem Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Very Young Patients with Multiple Myeloma.极年轻多发性骨髓瘤患者的串联自体造血干细胞移植
South Asian J Cancer. 2020 Oct;9(4):233-235. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1727068. Epub 2021 Jun 14.