Suppr超能文献

跑步与骑行高强度间歇运动对18至30岁久坐男性局部组织氧合及主观愉悦感的影响

The effect of running versus cycling high-intensity intermittent exercise on local tissue oxygenation and perceived enjoyment in 18-30-year-old sedentary men.

作者信息

Kriel Yuri, Askew Christopher D, Solomon Colin

机构信息

School of Health and Sports Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2018 Jun 19;6:e5026. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5026. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has been proposed as a time-efficient exercise format to improve exercise adherence, thereby targeting the chronic disease burden associated with sedentary behaviour. Exercise mode (cycling, running), if self-selected, will likely affect the physiological and enjoyment responses to HIIT in sedentary individuals. Differences in physiological and enjoyment responses, associated with the mode of exercise, could potentially influence the uptake and continued adherence to HIIT. It was hypothesised that in young sedentary men, local and systemic oxygen utilisation and enjoyment would be higher during a session of running HIIT, compared to a session of cycling HIIT.

METHODS

A total of 12 sedentary men (mean ± SD; age 24 ± 3 years) completed three exercise sessions: a maximal incremental exercise test on a treadmill (MAX) followed by two experiment conditions, (1) free-paced cycling HIIT on a bicycle ergometer (HIITCYC) and (2) constant-paced running HIIT on a treadmill ergometer (HIITRUN). Deoxygenated haemoglobin (HHb) in the gastrocnemius (GN), the left vastus lateralis (LVL) and the right vastus lateralis (RVL) muscles, oxygen consumption (VO), heart rate (HR), ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and physical activity enjoyment (PACES) were measured during HIITCYC and HIITRUN.

RESULTS

There was a higher HHb in the LVL ( = 0.001) and RVL ( = 0.002) sites and a higher VO ( = 0.017) and HR ( < 0.001) during HIITCYC, compared to HIITRUN. RPE was higher ( < 0.001) and PACES lower ( = 0.032) during HIITCYC compared to HIITRUN.

DISCUSSION

In sedentary individuals, free-paced cycling HIIT produces higher levels of physiological stress when compared to constant-paced running HIIT. Participants perceived running HIIT to be more enjoyable than cycling HIIT. These findings have implications for selection of mode of HIIT for physical stress, exercise enjoyment and compliance.

摘要

背景

高强度间歇训练(HIIT)被认为是一种高效的运动方式,有助于提高运动依从性,从而减轻与久坐行为相关的慢性疾病负担。如果让个体自行选择,运动模式(如骑自行车、跑步)可能会影响久坐人群对HIIT的生理反应和运动体验。与运动模式相关的生理反应和运动体验差异,可能会对HIIT的接受度和持续参与度产生潜在影响。研究假设,在年轻的久坐男性中,与骑行HIIT相比,跑步HIIT期间局部和全身的氧气利用率以及运动体验会更高。

方法

共有12名久坐男性(平均±标准差;年龄24±3岁)完成了三个运动阶段:在跑步机上进行一次最大递增运动测试(MAX),随后是两个实验条件,(1)在自行车测力计上进行自由节奏的骑行HIIT(HIITCYC)和(2)在跑步机测力计上进行恒定节奏的跑步HIIT(HIITRUN)。在HIITCYC和HIITRUN期间,测量腓肠肌(GN)、左侧股外侧肌(LVL)和右侧股外侧肌(RVL)中的脱氧血红蛋白(HHb)、耗氧量(VO)、心率(HR)、主观用力程度评分(RPE)和身体活动愉悦感(PACES)。

结果

与HIITRUN相比,HIITCYC期间LVL部位( = 0.001)和RVL部位( = 0.002)的HHb更高,VO( = 0.017)和HR( < 0.001)也更高。与HIITRUN相比,HIITCYC期间RPE更高( < 0.001),PACES更低( = 0. – 032)。

讨论

在久坐人群中,与恒定节奏的跑步HIIT相比,自由节奏的骑行HIIT会产生更高水平的生理压力。参与者认为跑步HIIT比骑行HIIT更令人愉悦。这些发现对于选择HIIT的运动模式以应对身体压力、运动愉悦感和依从性具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54e5/6014319/aa41cbfa4ea4/peerj-06-5026-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验