Haas Christian, Hall Margeret, Vlasnik Sandra L
College of Information Science and Technology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, 1110 S 67th Street, Omaha, NE 68182, USA.
Heliyon. 2018 Jun 20;4(6):e00634. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00634. eCollection 2018 Jun.
Two-Sided Matching is a well-established approach to find allocations and matchings based on the participants' preferences. While its most prominent applications are College Admissions and School Choice problems, this paper applies the concept to the matching of mentors to mentees in a higher education context. Both mentors and mentees have preferences with whom they ideally want to be matched, as well as who they want to avoid. As the general formulation for these types of preferences is NP-hard, several existing approximation algorithms and heuristics are compared with respect to their ability to find a matching with desirable properties. The results show that a combination of evolutionary heuristics and local search approaches works best in finding high-quality solutions, allowing us to find mentor-mentee pairs which are close to the respective ideal match.
双边匹配是一种基于参与者偏好来寻找分配和匹配的成熟方法。虽然其最突出的应用是大学招生和学校选择问题,但本文将该概念应用于高等教育背景下导师与学员的匹配。导师和学员都有他们理想中希望与之匹配的对象的偏好,以及他们想要避免的对象。由于这类偏好的一般表述是NP难问题,因此对几种现有的近似算法和启发式算法在寻找具有理想属性的匹配的能力方面进行了比较。结果表明,进化启发式算法和局部搜索方法的组合在寻找高质量解决方案方面效果最佳,使我们能够找到接近各自理想匹配的导师-学员对。