Suppr超能文献

[关于长期护理当前质量辩论的批判性讨论——呼吁对长期护理质量的发展和衡量进行系统和实证洞察]

[Critical discussion on the current quality debate on long-term care-a plea for a systemic and empirical insight into the development and measurement of quality in long-term care].

作者信息

Hasseler Martina

机构信息

Medizinische Fakultät, Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin & Versorgungsforschung, Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Turm West, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.

出版信息

Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Aug;52(5):468-476. doi: 10.1007/s00391-018-1420-x. Epub 2018 Jun 25.

Abstract

Against the background of the quality debates on long-term care and recurrent reform measures in politics on this topic, a critical discussion on the current state of quality development, testing and reporting in Germany is presented. In Germany, the linear model of Donabedian's structural, process and outcome quality is still used as a basis for quality issues in nursing care; however, international research suggests that multiple and mutually interacting factors influence nursing quality and that a more systematic and systemic perspective for the further development of nursing quality (especially of features, criteria and indicators of nursing quality) appears more appropriate. This article intends to open the perspective of the development, measurement and reporting of quality in nursing and to make a critical contribution for a systemic theory development as a relevant basis for future developments of quality evaluation programs and quality reporting systems in long-term care.

摘要

在长期护理质量辩论以及政治层面针对该主题反复出台改革措施的背景下,本文对德国质量发展、测试及报告的现状展开了批判性讨论。在德国,护理质量问题仍以多纳贝迪安的结构、过程和结果质量线性模型为基础;然而,国际研究表明,多种相互作用的因素会影响护理质量,对于护理质量的进一步发展(尤其是护理质量的特征、标准和指标)而言,采用更具系统性的视角似乎更为合适。本文旨在拓展护理质量发展、衡量及报告的视角,并为系统性理论发展做出批判性贡献,作为长期护理质量评估项目和质量报告系统未来发展的相关基础。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验