• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Attitudes to publication of quality testing reports in nursing homes].

作者信息

König Andrea, Erling Rüdiger, Reuschenbach Bernd

机构信息

Katholische Stiftungshochschule München, Preysingstraße 95, 81667, München, Deutschland.

Bayerisches Landesamt für Pflege, Amberg, Deutschland.

出版信息

Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2021 Dec;54(8):810-815. doi: 10.1007/s00391-020-01767-6. Epub 2020 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1007/s00391-020-01767-6
PMID:32737570
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Nursing and Living Quality Act (PfleWoqG) regulates the implementation of legally regulated quality inspections and publication of statutory quality inspection reports for residential nursing homes in Bavaria. In the currently valid version, the quality records have to be published but a decision of the higher administrative court (VGH) repealed this rule and it is no longer in force.

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

Within the framework of a project for the Bavarian State Ministry for Health and Nursing concerning the revision of the publication of legally regulated quality testing reports, appraisals by the institutional management in nursing homes were collated. The E‑survey reached 24% (n = 529) of all residential care homes for elderly people and residential care homes for handicapped people in Bavaria.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Approximately two thirds of the persons questioned attested that the inspections and the resulting reports reflected an appropriate picture of the quality of nursing carried out in the institutions. Nevertheless, the vast majority did not approve of the obligatory publication of the quality testing records. While the inspections were seen as a valuable basis to reflect on the quality of care in the institutions, it was simultaneously argued that the inspections are only snapshots, which could be misinterpreted by the public. It was criticized that the quality testing records were not comprehensible for users. Furthermore, it was commented that the ratings of the responsible authorities were influenced by the competence of the inspectors and their subjective point of view and there was therefore a risk that invalid results would be made public.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Attitudes to publication of quality testing reports in nursing homes].
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2021 Dec;54(8):810-815. doi: 10.1007/s00391-020-01767-6. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
2
[Hygienic aspects with regard to nursing of home care patients with AIDS, chronic diseases and mental handicaps].[艾滋病、慢性病及智力障碍居家护理患者的卫生护理要点]
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1995 Apr;197(1-3):26-44.
3
[Preoperational study for the improvement of hygiene conditions in long-term care facilities].[改善长期护理机构卫生条件的术前研究]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2014 Dec;57(12):1424-31. doi: 10.1007/s00103-014-2064-7.
4
["We need a new philosophy in the care of elderly people!" Findings about the implementation of the "Charter of Rights for People Needing Care and Nursing" in senior and nursing homes].["我们需要一种照顾老年人的新理念!”关于在养老院和护理院中实施“护理和照料需求者权利宪章”的调查结果]
Pflege Z. 2007 Oct;60(10):564-7.
5
The quasi-market for adult residential care in the UK: Do for-profit, not-for-profit or public sector residential care and nursing homes provide better quality care?英国成人住宿护理的准市场:营利性、非营利性或公共部门的住宿护理院及疗养院能提供质量更好的护理服务吗?
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Apr;179:137-146. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.037. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
6
[The attitude of patients in geriatric rehabilitation towards nursing homes].[老年康复患者对养老院的态度]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2021 Aug;54(5):485-491. doi: 10.1007/s00391-020-01773-8. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
7
Does investor-ownership of nursing homes compromise the quality of care?养老院由投资者所有会降低护理质量吗?
Int J Health Serv. 2002;32(2):315-25. doi: 10.2190/EBCN-WECV-C0NT-676R.
8
[Treatment by panel physicians of patients in protective institutions and homes : Analysis based on secondary data].[防护机构和家庭中患者的专科医生治疗:基于二手数据的分析]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Feb;51(2):213-221. doi: 10.1007/s00391-016-1144-8. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
9
Ambiguities: residents' experience of 'nursing home as my home'.歧义:居民对“养老院就是我的家”的体验。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2013 Sep;8(3):216-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-3743.2012.00320.x. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
10
[Pressure ulcer in German Nursing Homes: Quality Assessment Using Claims Data of Statutory Health and Long-Term Care Insurance].[德国养老院中的压疮:利用法定健康保险和长期护理保险的理赔数据进行质量评估]
Gesundheitswesen. 2020 Mar;82(S 01):S52-S61. doi: 10.1055/a-1057-8799. Epub 2020 Feb 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Determinants of nursing home choice: Does reported quality matter?选择养老院的决定因素:报告的质量是否重要?
Health Econ. 2020 Jul;29(7):766-777. doi: 10.1002/hec.4018. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
2
[Quality reporting in long-term care facilities-information requirements, search strategies, and information sources for persons in need of care and their family members].
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2019 Mar;62(3):311-319. doi: 10.1007/s00103-019-02885-2.
3
[Critical discussion on the current quality debate on long-term care-a plea for a systemic and empirical insight into the development and measurement of quality in long-term care].[关于长期护理当前质量辩论的批判性讨论——呼吁对长期护理质量的发展和衡量进行系统和实证洞察]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Aug;52(5):468-476. doi: 10.1007/s00391-018-1420-x. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
4
Competition, information, and quality: Evidence from nursing homes.竞争、信息与质量:来自养老院的证据
J Health Econ. 2016 Sep;49:136-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
5
Changes in Consumer Demand Following Public Reporting of Summary Quality Ratings: An Evaluation in Nursing Homes.公共报告总结质量评级后消费者需求的变化:养老院的一项评估
Health Serv Res. 2016 Jun;51 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):1291-309. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12459. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
6
[Public reporting in health care: the impact of publicly reported quality data on patient steerage].
Gesundheitswesen. 2012 Jun;74(6):e25-41. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1285857. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
7
Is a public reporting approach appropriate for nursing home care?公开报告的方式适用于疗养院护理吗?
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2006 Aug;31(4):773-810. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2006-003.
8
Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES).提高网络调查质量:互联网电子调查结果报告清单(CHERRIES)。
J Med Internet Res. 2004 Sep 29;6(3):e34. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34.