Suppr超能文献

在线和面对面填写运动前筛查问卷的一致性。

Agreement between pre-exercise screening questionnaires completed online versus face-to-face.

机构信息

Health and Exercise Science, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia.

South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Jun 26;13(6):e0199836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199836. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the levels of agreement between self-reported responses to the Adult Pre-exercise Screening System (APSS) questionnaire using online versus face-to-face (F2F) modalities.

DESIGN

Convenience sample of adults completing a pre-exercise screening questionnaire using different modalities.

METHODS

Adult volunteers (n = 94) were recruited to complete the APSS using both online and F2F modalities. Participants were provided a URL link to an online APSS questionnaire then followed-up the next day in a F2F interview. Objective health risk factors were also measured. Comparisons between responses were undertaken using kappa and correlation statistics to determine levels of agreement.

RESULTS

The levels of agreement between online versus F2F responses for the seven compulsory Stage 1 questions (known diseases and signs and/or symptoms of disease) were >94% (kappa = 0.644-0.794). Response comparisons for Stage 2 questions on health risk factors were also generally high (>82% agreement) but there were larger differences between reported and measured risk factors in Stage 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Levels of agreement between the Stage 1 responses were substantial and support the use of this online option for pre-exercise screening. There were larger differences between self-reported and objectively measured health risk factors in Stages 2 and 3.

摘要

目的

调查使用在线与面对面(F2F)两种模式回答成人运动前筛查系统(APSS)问卷时的自我报告反应之间的一致性水平。

设计

使用不同模式完成运动前筛查问卷的成人便利样本。

方法

招募成年志愿者(n=94)使用在线和 F2F 两种模式完成 APSS。向参与者提供一个在线 APSS 问卷的 URL 链接,然后在第二天的 F2F 访谈中跟进。还测量了客观健康风险因素。使用kappa 和相关统计数据比较反应,以确定一致性水平。

结果

对于七个强制性第 1 阶段问题(已知疾病和疾病的迹象和/或症状),在线与 F2F 反应之间的一致性水平>94%(kappa=0.644-0.794)。对健康风险因素的第 2 阶段问题的反应比较也普遍较高(>82%的一致性),但在第 3 阶段,报告的和测量的风险因素之间存在更大的差异。

结论

第 1 阶段反应之间的一致性水平较高,支持将这种在线选项用于运动前筛查。在第 2 阶段和第 3 阶段,自我报告和客观测量的健康风险因素之间存在更大的差异。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
Preventing exercise-related cardiovascular events: is a medical examination more urgent for physical activity or inactivity?
Circulation. 2014 Mar 11;129(10):1081-4. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.007641. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
9
Cardiac arrest during long-distance running races.长跑比赛中心脏骤停。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 12;366(2):130-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1106468.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验