Oda Arata, Kamei Yoshiya, Hiroma Takehiko, Nakamura Tomohiko
Division of Neonatology, Nagano Children's Hospital, Shinshu University, Nagano, Japan.
Division of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Pediatr Int. 2018 Sep;60(9):844-848. doi: 10.1111/ped.13646. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) is expected to improve respiratory outcomes in preterm infants, but it has not yet been evaluated. We investigated whether NAVA could improve respiratory outcomes and reduce sedation use in extremely low-birthweight infants (ELBWI).
A retrospective cohort study was conducted based on patient charts at the Nagano Children's Hospital neonatal intensive care unit, Japan. Infants who were born at <27 weeks' gestation were included. We assessed the prevalence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), home oxygen therapy (HOT), duration of intubation, and sedation use.
The NAVA group consisted of 14 ELBWI who were born at <27 weeks' gestation between September 2013 and September 2015. A total of 21 ELBWI born between September 2011 and September 2013, before NAVA implementation, served as the control group. There were no significant differences in the perinatal background characteristics between the two groups. For respiratory outcomes, no significant between-group differences were found in the prevalence of BPD and HOT or the duration of intubation. The total duration of sedation use was not significantly different between the two groups, but in the NAVA group, midazolam was discontinued in all cases after the infants were switched to NAVA.
NAVA was safe in preterm infants and had a similar effect to conventional mechanical ventilation with regard to respiratory outcomes and sedation use in the chronic phase; thus, NAVA could be used in the early phase, at least before BPD worsens to improve respiratory outcomes in ELBWI.
神经调节通气辅助(NAVA)有望改善早产儿的呼吸结局,但尚未得到评估。我们研究了NAVA是否能改善极低出生体重儿(ELBWI)的呼吸结局并减少镇静药物的使用。
基于日本长野儿童医院新生儿重症监护病房的病历进行了一项回顾性队列研究。纳入孕周<27周出生的婴儿。我们评估了支气管肺发育不良(BPD)的患病率、家庭氧疗(HOT)、插管持续时间和镇静药物的使用情况。
NAVA组由2013年9月至2015年9月期间出生孕周<27周的14例ELBWI组成。2011年9月至2013年9月在实施NAVA之前出生的21例ELBWI作为对照组。两组围产期背景特征无显著差异。对于呼吸结局,BPD患病率、HOT或插管持续时间在组间无显著差异。两组镇静药物使用的总时长无显著差异,但在NAVA组,婴儿改用NAVA后所有病例的咪达唑仑均停用。
NAVA在早产儿中是安全的,在慢性期的呼吸结局和镇静药物使用方面与传统机械通气效果相似;因此,NAVA可在早期使用,至少在BPD恶化之前,以改善ELBWI的呼吸结局。