Inderhaug Eivind, Kalsvik Maiken, Kollevold Kristin H, Hegna Janne, Solheim Eirik
Surgical Department, Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital, Norway.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
J Orthop. 2018 Mar 17;15(3):757-760. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.03.004. eCollection 2018 Sep.
Some studies suggest a common degenerative path might contribute to a range of shoulder diseases involving subacromial pain syndrome and full-thickness rotator cuff tears. One could therefore theorize arthroscopic subacromial decompression and rotator cuff repair as interventions at different stages of a degenerative shoulder disease. Few studies have compared long-term outcomes after these two procedures.
Matched case-controls undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair combined with subacromial decompression (N = 180) or subacromial decompression only (N = 180) were evaluated pre- and 7.5 years postoperatively using QuickDASH score, VAS of function, VAS of pain and VAS of satisfaction. New surgery and complications were recorded. Baseline characteristics were related to outcomes to investigate predictors of good/poor outcome.
A general improvement from baseline was seen - from 51 to 14 (QuickDASH) in the combined group and from 53 to 16 in the decompression only group. No differences in outcomes were seen between groups (n.s.). Age above 55 at surgery predicted better VAS of function (P = .04) while acute onset of symptoms predicted better QuickDASH in the combined group (P = 0.03). None in the decompression group had undergone later rotator cuff repair.
Major improvements in pain/function were seen at mid- to long-term after isolated arthroscopic subacromial decompression and combined decompression/rotator cuff repair. Several patient-specific factors predicting worse outcomes were identified.
一些研究表明,一条共同的退变路径可能导致一系列涉及肩峰下疼痛综合征和全层肩袖撕裂的肩部疾病。因此,可以推测关节镜下肩峰下减压和肩袖修复是退变性肩部疾病不同阶段的干预措施。很少有研究比较这两种手术的长期疗效。
对接受关节镜下肩袖修复联合肩峰下减压(N = 180)或仅接受肩峰下减压(N = 180)的匹配病例对照进行术前和术后7.5年的评估,使用QuickDASH评分、功能视觉模拟评分(VAS)、疼痛VAS和满意度VAS。记录再次手术和并发症情况。将基线特征与疗效相关联,以研究预后良好/不良的预测因素。
与基线相比,两组均有总体改善——联合组的QuickDASH评分从51降至14,仅减压组从53降至16。两组间疗效无差异(无统计学意义)。手术时年龄超过55岁预示着功能VAS更好(P = 0.04),而症状急性发作预示着联合组的QuickDASH评分更好(P = 0.03)。减压组中无人接受后期肩袖修复。
单纯关节镜下肩峰下减压以及联合减压/肩袖修复术后中长期疼痛/功能有显著改善。确定了几个预示预后较差的患者特异性因素。