Suppr超能文献

两种不同导航髋关节置换技术在肢体长度差异方面的比较。

A comparison of two different navigated hip replacement techniques on leg length discrepancy.

作者信息

Jennison T N, Craig P, Davis Edward D

机构信息

Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, West Midlands, DY1 2HQ, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Orthop. 2018 Feb 21;15(3):765-767. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.02.005. eCollection 2018 Sep.

Abstract

We hypothesised that a femoral array placed into bone or an external (pinless) reference marker made no difference to leg length discrepancy in patients undergoing navigated total hip arthroplasty. Consecutive patients undergoing navigated total hip arthroplasty. 162 patients. No statistical difference between preoperative leg length discrepancy (p = 0.524). Mean intraoperative change was 3.7 mm and 4.6 mm (p = 0.262). The mean change in leg length measure post operatively was 4.2 mm and 4.1 mm (p = 0.656). No significant difference in leg length discrepancy between a pinless reference markers and a femoral array placed into the bone.

摘要

我们假设,对于接受导航全髋关节置换术的患者,置入骨内的股骨阵列或外部(无针)参考标记物对腿长差异并无影响。连续纳入接受导航全髋关节置换术的患者,共162例。术前腿长差异无统计学差异(p = 0.524)。术中平均变化分别为3.7毫米和4.6毫米(p = 0.262)。术后腿长测量的平均变化分别为4.2毫米和4.1毫米(p = 0.656)。无针参考标记物与置入骨内的股骨阵列之间的腿长差异无显著差异。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Limb-length discrepancy after hip arthroplasty.髋关节置换术后肢体长度差异。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Aug 7;95(15):1426-36. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00433.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验