Suppr超能文献

在开始引产之前,胎儿枕骨和脊柱位置的评估有多可靠?

How reliable is fetal occiput and spine position assessment prior to induction of labor?

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasr Al-Ainy University Hospital, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;53(4):535-540. doi: 10.1002/uog.19169. Epub 2019 Feb 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the reliability of fetal occiput and spine position determination in nulliparous women prior to induction of labor (IOL), and to evaluate identification of fetal occiput and spine positions prior to IOL in the prediction of labor outcome.

METHODS

A series of 136 nulliparous women were recruited prospectively, immediately after the decision to perform IOL was made. Transabdominal ultrasound was performed to determine fetal head and spine positions. After at least 1 h, and prior to IOL, fetal occiput and spine positions were reassessed. Fetal occiput and spine positions were then compared between women who underwent vaginal delivery and those who delivered by Cesarean section.

RESULTS

On the first and second assessments, respectively, fetal occiput position was anterior in 55 (40.4%) and 62 (45.6%) women, transverse in 52 (38.2%) and 49 (36.0%) women, and posterior in 29 (21.3%) and 25 (18.4%) women, while fetal spine position was anterior in 58 (42.6%) and 52 (38.2%) women, transverse in 42 (30.9%) and 50 (36.8%) women, and posterior in 36 (26.5%) and 34 (25.0%) women. Discordance between the first and second assessments of fetal occiput position was identified in 34 (25.0%) women, whereas discordance of fetal spine position was observed in 40 (29.4%) women. The incidence of fetal occiput posterior position in women undergoing Cesarean section was comparable to that in the vaginal-delivery group (19 (18.8%) vs 6 (17.1%); P = 0.826), which was similarly the case for fetal posterior spine position (27 (26.7%) vs 7 (20%); P = 0.428). Women with fetal occiput posterior position had a longer induction-to-delivery interval in comparison to those with non-occiput posterior fetal position (1786 ± 805 vs 1347 ± 784 min; P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Fetal occiput and spine positions are dynamic in a considerable proportion of women undergoing IOL, and their assessment does not seem to correlate with mode of delivery. Occiput and spine position assessment in women prior to IOL is unlikely to be clinically useful. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

摘要

目的

评估初产妇行引产(IOL)前胎儿枕骨和脊柱位置的可靠性,并评估 IOL 前胎儿枕骨和脊柱位置的定位对分娩结局的预测价值。

方法

本研究前瞻性地连续招募了 136 例初产妇,均在决定行 IOL 后即刻入组。采用经腹超声检查确定胎头和脊柱位置。至少 1 h 后,在 IOL 前再次评估胎儿枕骨和脊柱位置。比较阴道分娩组和剖宫产组产妇的胎儿枕骨和脊柱位置。

结果

第一次和第二次评估时,胎儿枕骨位置分别为前位 55(40.4%)和 62(45.6%)例,横位 52(38.2%)和 49(36.0%)例,后位 29(21.3%)和 25(18.4%)例,胎儿脊柱位置分别为前位 58(42.6%)和 52(38.2%)例,横位 42(30.9%)和 50(36.8%)例,后位 36(26.5%)和 34(25.0%)例。34(25.0%)例胎儿枕骨位置在两次评估中存在差异,40(29.4%)例胎儿脊柱位置存在差异。行剖宫产的产妇中,胎儿枕骨后位的发生率与阴道分娩组相当(19(18.8%)vs 6(17.1%);P = 0.826),胎儿脊柱后位的发生率也相似(27(26.7%)vs 7(20%);P = 0.428)。与非枕骨后位胎儿相比,枕骨后位胎儿的引产至分娩间隔时间更长(1786 ± 805 vs 1347 ± 784 min;P = 0.013)。

结论

在相当一部分行 IOL 的初产妇中,胎儿枕骨和脊柱位置是动态变化的,其评估结果似乎与分娩方式无关。在 IOL 前评估产妇的枕骨和脊柱位置可能在临床上没有意义。版权所有© 2018 ISUOG。由 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 出版。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验