• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PERC 和 YEARS 规则联合用于低临床肺栓塞可能性患者的安全性:两项大型欧洲队列的回顾性分析。

Safety of the Combination of PERC and YEARS Rules in Patients With Low Clinical Probability of Pulmonary Embolism: A Retrospective Analysis of Two Large European Cohorts.

机构信息

Emergency Department, Hôpital Lariboisière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.

Emergency Department, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jan;26(1):23-30. doi: 10.1111/acem.13508. Epub 2018 Aug 10.

DOI:10.1111/acem.13508
PMID:29947451
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the failure rate of a combination of the PERC and the YEARS rules for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of two European cohorts of emergency patients with low gestalt clinical probability of PE (PROPER and PERCEPIC). All patients we included were managed using a conventional strategy (D-dimer test, followed, if positive, by computed tomographic pulmonary angiogram (CTPA). We tested a diagnostic strategy that combined PERC and YEARS to rule out PE. The primary endpoint was a thromboembolic event diagnosed in the ED or at 3-months follow-up. Secondary endpoints included a thromboembolic event at baseline in the ED and a CTPA in the ED. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals (CIs) of proportions were calculated with the use of Wilson's continuity correction.

RESULTS

We analyzed 1,951 patients (mean ± SD age = 47 ± 18 years, 56% women) with an overall proportion of patients with PE of 3.5%. Both PERC and YEARS strategies were associated with 11 missed PE in the ED: failure rate 0.57 (95% CI = 0.32-1.02). At 3-month follow-up, the overall failure rate was 0.83% (95% CI = 0.51-1.35). Among the 503 patients who underwent a CTPA (26%), the use of the PERC-YEARS combination would have ruled out PE without CTPA in 249 patients (50% [95%CI = 45%-54%], absolute reduction 13% (95% CI = 11%-14%]).

CONCLUSION

The combination of PERC then YEARS was associated with a low risk of PE diagnostic failure and would have resulted in a relative reduction of almost half of CTPA.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定 PERC 和 YEARS 规则联合用于诊断急诊科(ED)肺栓塞(PE)的失败率。

方法

我们对两个具有低整体临床可能性的欧洲急诊患者队列(PROPER 和 PERCEPIC)进行了回顾性分析。所有纳入的患者均采用常规策略(D-二聚体检测,如果阳性,进行计算机断层肺动脉造影(CTPA))进行管理。我们测试了一种联合 PERC 和 YEARS 规则排除 PE 的诊断策略。主要终点是在 ED 或 3 个月随访时诊断出的血栓栓塞事件。次要终点包括 ED 基线时的血栓栓塞事件和 ED 中的 CTPA。使用 Wilson 连续性校正计算比例的 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

我们分析了 1951 名患者(平均年龄±标准差为 47±18 岁,56%为女性),总体 PE 患者比例为 3.5%。PERC 和 YEARS 两种策略在 ED 中均漏诊了 11 例 PE:失败率为 0.57(95%CI=0.32-1.02)。在 3 个月随访时,总体失败率为 0.83%(95%CI=0.51-1.35)。在接受 CTPA(26%)的 503 名患者中,使用 PERC-YEARS 联合策略可排除 249 例患者(50%[95%CI=45%-54%],绝对减少 13%[95%CI=11%-14%])而无需进行 CTPA。

结论

PERC 后联合 YEARS 规则与 PE 诊断失败的低风险相关,并将导致 CTPA 的相对减少近一半。

相似文献

1
Safety of the Combination of PERC and YEARS Rules in Patients With Low Clinical Probability of Pulmonary Embolism: A Retrospective Analysis of Two Large European Cohorts.PERC 和 YEARS 规则联合用于低临床肺栓塞可能性患者的安全性:两项大型欧洲队列的回顾性分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jan;26(1):23-30. doi: 10.1111/acem.13508. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
2
Effect of the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria on Subsequent Thromboembolic Events Among Low-Risk Emergency Department Patients: The PROPER Randomized Clinical Trial.肺栓塞排除标准对低风险急诊科患者后续血栓栓塞事件的影响:PROPER随机临床试验
JAMA. 2018 Feb 13;319(6):559-566. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21904.
3
PERC rule to exclude the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in emergency low-risk patients: study protocol for the PROPER randomized controlled study.PERC 规则排除急诊低危患者肺栓塞诊断:PROPER 随机对照研究方案。
Trials. 2015 Nov 25;16:537. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1049-7.
4
Pulmonary Embolism Testing Among Emergency Department Patients Who Are Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria Negative.急诊科中肺栓塞排除标准为阴性的患者的肺栓塞检测
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Nov;24(11):1369-1376. doi: 10.1111/acem.13270. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
5
Combination of Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria and YEARS Algorithm in a European Cohort of Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism.在欧洲疑似肺栓塞患者队列中,联合应用肺栓塞排除标准和 YEARS 算法。
Thromb Haemost. 2018 Mar;118(3):547-552. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1623535. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
6
Retrospective validation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria rule in 'PE unlikely' patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.回顾性验证“PE 可能性不大”的疑似肺栓塞患者中肺栓塞排除标准规则。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;25(3):185-190. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000442.
7
Evaluation of the "hemoptysis" item in clinical decision rules for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department.评价急诊科临床决策规则中用于诊断肺栓塞的“咯血”项目。
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Oct;29(10):1205-1212. doi: 10.1111/acem.14574. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
8
CT Pulmonary Angiography: Using Decision Rules in the Emergency Department.CT肺动脉造影:在急诊科运用决策规则
J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Oct;12(10):1023-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.06.002.
9
Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria vs D-dimer testing in low-risk patients for pulmonary embolism: a retrospective study.肺栓塞排除标准与D-二聚体检测在肺栓塞低风险患者中的应用:一项回顾性研究
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Jun;32(6):609-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.03.008. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
10
A retrospective analysis of the combined use of PERC rule and Wells score to exclude pulmonary embolism in the Emergency Department.急诊科应用PERC规则与Wells评分联合排除肺栓塞的回顾性分析。
Emerg Med J. 2016 Oct;33(10):696-701. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-205687. Epub 2016 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
How to Combat Over-Testing for Patients Suspected of Pulmonary Embolism: A Narrative Review.如何应对疑似肺栓塞患者的过度检查:一项叙述性综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Apr 3;13(7):1326. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13071326.
2
MOdified DIagnostic strateGy to safely ruLe-out pulmonary embolism In the emergency depArtment: study protocol for the Non-Inferiority MODIGLIANI cluster cross-over randomized trial.改良诊断策略在急诊科安全排除肺栓塞的研究:非劣效性 MODIGLIANI 聚类交叉随机试验研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jun 3;21(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04379-y.
3
Updates in pulmonary hypertension and other pulmonary vascular diseases.
肺动脉高压及其他肺血管疾病的进展
Breathe (Sheff). 2019 Sep;15(3):241-243. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0187-2019.