• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良诊断策略在急诊科安全排除肺栓塞的研究:非劣效性 MODIGLIANI 聚类交叉随机试验研究方案。

MOdified DIagnostic strateGy to safely ruLe-out pulmonary embolism In the emergency depArtment: study protocol for the Non-Inferiority MODIGLIANI cluster cross-over randomized trial.

机构信息

Emergency department, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, APHP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.

Emergency Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Trials. 2020 Jun 3;21(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04379-y.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-020-04379-y
PMID:32493383
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7268276/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In the work-up strategy for pulmonary embolism (PE) in the ED, the recently introduced YEARS rule allows the raising of the D-dimer threshold to 1000 ng/ml in patients with no signs of deep venous thrombosis and no hemoptysis and in whom PE is not the most likely diagnosis. However, this decision rule has never been prospectively compared to the usual strategy. Furthermore, it is unclear if the YEARS rule can be used on top of the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC). We aim to assess the non-inferiority of YEARS compared to current guidelines to rule out PE among PERC-positive ED patients with suspicion of PE.

METHODS/DESIGN: The MODIGLIANI study is a multicenter, European, non-inferiority, cluster-randomized, two periods cross-over, controlled trial. Each center will be randomized for the sequence of two 4-month periods: intervention (MOdified Diagnostic Strategy: MODS) followed by control (usual care), or control followed by intervention with 1 month of "wash-out" between the two periods. In the control period, the threshold will be as usual (500 ng/ml for patients aged 50 years or younger and age × 10 for older patients). In the MODS period, the threshold of D-dimers to rule out PE will be raised to 1000 ng/ml if no item of the YEARS score is present or will remain unchanged otherwise. Patients will be included if they have a suspicion of PE, defined as chest pain, dyspnea, or syncope. Non-inclusion criteria comprise a high clinical probability of PE or PERC-negative patients with low clinical probability.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has received the following approvals: Comité de protection des personnes Ile de France XI (France) and Comité de Ética de la Investigación con medicamentos del Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (Spain). Results will be made available to all included participants and other researchers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04032769. Registered on 24 July 2019.

摘要

简介

在急诊科(ED)进行肺栓塞(PE)的检查策略中,最近引入的 YEARS 规则允许在没有深静脉血栓形成迹象且无咯血且 PE 不太可能诊断的患者中,将 D-二聚体阈值提高至 1000ng/ml。然而,该决策规则从未前瞻性地与常规策略进行比较。此外,尚不清楚 YEARS 规则是否可用于 Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria(PERC)之上。我们旨在评估 YEARS 规则与目前的指南相比,在怀疑患有 PE 的 PERC 阳性 ED 患者中排除 PE 的非劣效性。

方法/设计:MODIGLIANI 研究是一项多中心、欧洲、非劣效性、聚类随机、两期交叉、对照试验。每个中心将随机分配两个为期 4 个月的时间段的顺序:干预期(改良诊断策略:MODS)后为对照组(常规护理),或对照组后为干预组,两者之间有 1 个月的“洗脱期”。在对照组中,阈值将如前所述(50 岁及以下患者为 500ng/ml,年龄较大的患者为年龄×10)。在 MODS 期间,如果 YEARS 评分没有一项存在,将提高 D-二聚体排除 PE 的阈值至 1000ng/ml,否则保持不变。如果患者有 PE 疑似症状,定义为胸痛、呼吸困难或晕厥,则将其纳入研究。排除标准包括 PE 临床高度可能或 PERC 阴性且临床低度可能的患者。

伦理和传播

该研究已获得以下批准:法兰西岛 XI 区保护委员会(法国)和巴塞罗那临床医院药物研究伦理委员会(西班牙)。结果将提供给所有纳入的参与者和其他研究人员。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT04032769。于 2019 年 7 月 24 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bc4/7268276/54d309932540/13063_2020_4379_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bc4/7268276/e4e884c9c911/13063_2020_4379_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bc4/7268276/54d309932540/13063_2020_4379_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bc4/7268276/e4e884c9c911/13063_2020_4379_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bc4/7268276/54d309932540/13063_2020_4379_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
MOdified DIagnostic strateGy to safely ruLe-out pulmonary embolism In the emergency depArtment: study protocol for the Non-Inferiority MODIGLIANI cluster cross-over randomized trial.改良诊断策略在急诊科安全排除肺栓塞的研究:非劣效性 MODIGLIANI 聚类交叉随机试验研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jun 3;21(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04379-y.
2
Effect of a Diagnostic Strategy Using an Elevated and Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Threshold on Thromboembolic Events in Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: A Randomized Clinical Trial.采用升高和年龄校正的 D-二聚体阈值的诊断策略对疑似肺栓塞急诊科患者的血栓栓塞事件的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Dec 7;326(21):2141-2149. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.20750.
3
PERC rule to exclude the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in emergency low-risk patients: study protocol for the PROPER randomized controlled study.PERC 规则排除急诊低危患者肺栓塞诊断:PROPER 随机对照研究方案。
Trials. 2015 Nov 25;16:537. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1049-7.
4
Comparison of the safety and efficacy of YEARS, PEGeD, 4PEPS or the sole item "PE is the most likely diagnosis" strategies for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: post-hoc analysis of two European cohort studies.急诊科中 YEARS、PEGeD、4PEPS 或单一项目“PE 是最可能的诊断”策略对肺栓塞诊断的安全性和有效性比较:两项欧洲队列研究的事后分析
Eur J Emerg Med. 2022 Oct 1;29(5):341-347. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000967. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
5
Effect of the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria on Subsequent Thromboembolic Events Among Low-Risk Emergency Department Patients: The PROPER Randomized Clinical Trial.肺栓塞排除标准对低风险急诊科患者后续血栓栓塞事件的影响:PROPER随机临床试验
JAMA. 2018 Feb 13;319(6):559-566. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21904.
6
Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria vs D-dimer testing in low-risk patients for pulmonary embolism: a retrospective study.肺栓塞排除标准与D-二聚体检测在肺栓塞低风险患者中的应用:一项回顾性研究
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Jun;32(6):609-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.03.008. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
7
Cost-effectiveness of modified diagnostic strategy to safely rule-out pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: a non-inferiority cluster crossover randomized trial (MODIGLIA-NI).改良诊断策略在急诊科安全排除肺栓塞的成本效益:一项非劣效性聚类交叉随机试验(MODIGLIA-NI)。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Nov 29;23(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00910-x.
8
Retrospective validation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria rule in 'PE unlikely' patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.回顾性验证“PE 可能性不大”的疑似肺栓塞患者中肺栓塞排除标准规则。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;25(3):185-190. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000442.
9
Pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC) rule in European patients with low implicit clinical probability (PERCEPIC): a multicentre, prospective, observational study.欧洲低隐性临床可能性患者的肺栓塞排除标准(PERC)纳入标准(PERCEPIC):一项多中心、前瞻性、观察性研究。
Lancet Haematol. 2017 Dec;4(12):e615-e621. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30210-7. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
10
Use of the d-dimer for Detecting Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency Department.在急诊科使用D-二聚体检测肺栓塞
J Emerg Med. 2018 May;54(5):585-592. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.01.032. Epub 2018 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of modified diagnostic strategy to safely rule-out pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: a non-inferiority cluster crossover randomized trial (MODIGLIA-NI).改良诊断策略在急诊科安全排除肺栓塞的成本效益:一项非劣效性聚类交叉随机试验(MODIGLIA-NI)。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Nov 29;23(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00910-x.
2
Effect of a Diagnostic Strategy Using an Elevated and Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Threshold on Thromboembolic Events in Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: A Randomized Clinical Trial.采用升高和年龄校正的 D-二聚体阈值的诊断策略对疑似肺栓塞急诊科患者的血栓栓塞事件的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Dec 7;326(21):2141-2149. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.20750.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a standardized definition of pulmonary embolism-related death: A cross-sectional survey of international thrombosis experts.肺栓塞相关死亡标准化定义的制定:一项针对国际血栓形成专家的横断面调查。
J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Jun;18(6):1415-1420. doi: 10.1111/jth.14775. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
2
Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism with d-Dimer Adjusted to Clinical Probability.应用 D-二聚体调整临床可能性诊断肺栓塞。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 28;381(22):2125-2134. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1909159.
3
Prevalence of pulmonary embolism in emergency department patients with isolated syncope: a prospective cohort study.
急诊科孤立性晕厥患者中肺栓塞的患病率:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2019 Dec;26(6):458-461. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000625.
4
Safety of the Combination of PERC and YEARS Rules in Patients With Low Clinical Probability of Pulmonary Embolism: A Retrospective Analysis of Two Large European Cohorts.PERC 和 YEARS 规则联合用于低临床肺栓塞可能性患者的安全性:两项大型欧洲队列的回顾性分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jan;26(1):23-30. doi: 10.1111/acem.13508. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
5
Effect of Systematic Physician Cross-checking on Reducing Adverse Events in the Emergency Department: The CHARMED Cluster Randomized Trial.系统医生交叉核对对减少急诊科不良事件的影响:CHARMED 集群随机试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jun 1;178(6):812-819. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0607.
6
Effect of the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria on Subsequent Thromboembolic Events Among Low-Risk Emergency Department Patients: The PROPER Randomized Clinical Trial.肺栓塞排除标准对低风险急诊科患者后续血栓栓塞事件的影响:PROPER随机临床试验
JAMA. 2018 Feb 13;319(6):559-566. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21904.
7
Pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC) rule in European patients with low implicit clinical probability (PERCEPIC): a multicentre, prospective, observational study.欧洲低隐性临床可能性患者的肺栓塞排除标准(PERC)纳入标准(PERCEPIC):一项多中心、前瞻性、观察性研究。
Lancet Haematol. 2017 Dec;4(12):e615-e621. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30210-7. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
8
Disease prevalence dependent failure rate in diagnostic management studies on suspected deep vein thrombosis: communication from the SSC of the ISTH.关于疑似深静脉血栓形成的诊断管理研究中疾病患病率依赖性失败率:来自国际血栓与止血学会(ISTH)科学标准化委员会(SSC)的交流
J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Nov;15(11):2270-2273. doi: 10.1111/jth.13805. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
9
Simplified diagnostic management of suspected pulmonary embolism (the YEARS study): a prospective, multicentre, cohort study.疑似肺栓塞简化诊断管理研究(YEARS 研究):一项前瞻性、多中心、队列研究。
Lancet. 2017 Jul 15;390(10091):289-297. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30885-1. Epub 2017 May 23.
10
Towards a tailored diagnostic standard for future diagnostic studies in pulmonary embolism: communication from the SSC of the ISTH.迈向肺栓塞未来诊断研究的定制化诊断标准:来自国际血栓与止血学会科学和标准化委员会的交流
J Thromb Haemost. 2017 May;15(5):1040-1043. doi: 10.1111/jth.13654. Epub 2017 Mar 11.