Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Sunto-gun, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.
Division of Medical Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Sunto-gun, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.
Int J Clin Oncol. 2018 Dec;23(6):1189-1195. doi: 10.1007/s10147-018-1306-3. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
The efficacy of primary prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in preventing febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients treated with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) chemotherapy remains controversial. We compared the incidence of FN in patients treated with and without primary prophylactic G-CSF.
We performed a retrospective analysis of 142 patients with locally advanced head and neck or esophageal cancer treated with TPF between January 2009 and March 2017. Among them, 116 patients started TPF without primary prophylactic G-CSF (control group) while 26 patients were given primary prophylactic G-CSF from day 7 of the first cycle of TPF (prophylactic group).
The incidence of grade 4 neutropenia during the first cycle of TPF was significantly higher in the control group than in the prophylactic group [58.6% (n = 68) vs. 30.8% (n = 8), p = 0.02]. However, the incidence of FN in the first cycle was not significantly different between the two groups [32 patients (27.5%) in the control group and 8 patients (30.8%) in the prophylactic group (p = 0.62)]. In addition, the mean relative dose intensity throughout all cycles of TPF, as well as the survival time and response after TPF, were also not significantly different between the two groups.
Primary prophylactic G-CSF from day 7 of the first cycle of TPF did not reduce the incidence of FN. Our findings suggest that the timing of primary prophylactic G-CSF, as recommended by the American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines, should be modified to reduce the incidence of FN in TPF.
在接受多西他赛、顺铂和 5-氟尿嘧啶(TPF)化疗的患者中,初级预防粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)预防发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)的疗效仍存在争议。我们比较了接受和未接受初级预防 G-CSF 治疗的患者 FN 的发生率。
我们对 2009 年 1 月至 2017 年 3 月期间接受 TPF 治疗的局部晚期头颈部或食管癌 142 例患者进行了回顾性分析。其中,116 例患者在未接受初级预防 G-CSF(对照组)的情况下开始 TPF,26 例患者在 TPF 第一周期第 7 天开始接受初级预防 G-CSF(预防组)。
对照组 TPF 第一周期 4 级中性粒细胞减少症的发生率明显高于预防组[58.6%(n=68)比 30.8%(n=8),p=0.02]。然而,两组 TPF 第一周期 FN 的发生率无显著差异[对照组 32 例(27.5%),预防组 8 例(30.8%)(p=0.62)]。此外,两组 TPF 所有周期的平均相对剂量强度以及 TPF 后的生存时间和反应也无显著差异。
TPF 第一周期第 7 天开始的初级预防 G-CSF 并未降低 FN 的发生率。我们的研究结果表明,应修改美国临床肿瘤学会指南推荐的初级预防 G-CSF 时机,以降低 TPF 中 FN 的发生率。