Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Public and Child Dental Health, Dublin Dental University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Qual Life Res. 2018 Oct;27(10):2619-2627. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1903-7. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
To compare oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in children and adolescents with and without migration background, and to assess whether potential differences in OHRQoL can be sufficiently explained by oral health characteristics.
A consecutive sample of 112 children and adolescents was recruited in a German university-based orthodontic clinic, and a convenience sample of 313 children and adolescents of German public schools was enrolled in the study (total N = 425, age range 7-17 years). However, 29 participants were excluded due to insufficient information regarding migration background. Accordingly, the non-migrant group consisted of 262 participants (61.6%). For children with migration background, two groups were classified: (i) one parent born in a foreign country (N = 41, 9.6%, single-sided migration background), and (ii) both parents and/or child born in a foreign country ( N= 93, 21.9%, double-sided migration background). OHRQoL was assessed using the German 19-item version of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile (COHIP-G19). Additionally, physical oral health of 269 children with classified migration background was determined in a dental examination.
Overall, OHRQoL was significantly lower in the group with double-sided migration background indicated by lower COHIP-G19 summary scores (mean: 58.6 points) than in the group with single-sided migration background (mean: 63.3 points) or the non-migrant group (mean: 63.2 points). Likewise, the summary scores of the subscale "oral health well-being" and the subscale "social/emotional, school, and self-image" were also lower in the double-sided migrant group than in the other two groups. Linear regression analysis showed an association between double-sided migration background and impaired OHRQoL, even after statistically controlling for demographic, socioeconomic, and oral health characteristics.
Children and adolescents with double-sided migration background have poorer OHRQoL than comparably aged migrants with single-sided migration background or non-migrations. Between-group differences in OHRQoL could not be sufficiently explained by effects of socioeconomic status or physical oral health characteristics. Thus, other methodological, cultural, or immigration-related factors might also play an important role for the observed effects.
比较有和没有移民背景的儿童和青少年的口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL),并评估 OHRQoL 的潜在差异是否可以通过口腔健康特征得到充分解释。
在德国一所大学正畸诊所连续招募了 112 名儿童和青少年作为样本,并在德国公立学校的便利样本中招募了 313 名儿童和青少年(共 425 名,年龄 7-17 岁)。然而,由于有关移民背景的信息不足,有 29 名参与者被排除在外。因此,无移民背景组包括 262 名参与者(61.6%)。对于有移民背景的儿童,将其分为两组:(i)父母一方在国外出生(N=41,9.6%,单侧移民背景),和(ii)父母双方和/或孩子在国外出生(N=93,21.9%,双侧移民背景)。使用德国 19 项儿童口腔健康影响简表(COHIP-G19)评估 OHRQoL。此外,对有分类移民背景的 269 名儿童进行了口腔检查,以确定其口腔健康状况。
总体而言,双侧移民背景组的 OHRQoL 明显低于单侧移民背景组(COHIP-G19 综合评分:63.3 分)和无移民背景组(COHIP-G19 综合评分:63.2 分),表明双侧移民背景组的 COHIP-G19 综合评分(均值:58.6 分)较低。同样,“口腔健康幸福感”和“社会/情感、学校和自我形象”亚量表的评分也较低。线性回归分析显示,即使在统计学上控制了人口统计学、社会经济和口腔健康特征,双侧移民背景与 OHRQoL 受损之间仍存在关联。
与单侧移民背景的同龄移民或非移民相比,具有双侧移民背景的儿童和青少年的 OHRQoL 较差。OHRQoL 的组间差异不能通过社会经济地位或口腔健康特征的影响来充分解释。因此,其他方法学、文化或移民相关因素可能对观察到的影响也有重要作用。