Suppr超能文献

初级保健临床医生对密歇根州医疗补助扩大影响的看法:一项混合方法研究。

Primary Care Clinicians' Views About the Impact of Medicaid Expansion in Michigan: A Mixed Methods Study.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, 425W, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Aug;33(8):1307-1316. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4487-6. Epub 2018 Jun 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Michigan's approach to Medicaid expansion, the Healthy Michigan Plan (HMP), emphasizes primary care, prevention, and incentives for patients and primary care practitioners (PCPs).

OBJECTIVE

Assess PCPs' perspectives about the impact of HMP on their patients and practices.

DESIGN

In 2014-2015, we conducted semi-structured interviews then a statewide survey of PCPs.

SETTING

Interviewees came from varied types of practices in five Michigan regions selected for racial/ethnic diversity and a mix of rural and urban settings. Surveys were sent via mail.

PARTICIPANTS

Interviewees were physician (n = 16) and non-physician practitioners (n = 3). All Michigan PCPs caring for ≥ 12 HMP enrollees were surveyed (response rate 55.5%, N = 2104).

MEASUREMENTS

PCPs' experiences with HMP patients and recent changes in their practices.

RESULTS

Interviews include examples of the impact of Medicaid expansion on patients and practices. A majority of surveyed PCPs reported recent increases in new patients (52.3%) and patients who had not seen a PCP in many years (56.2%). For previously uninsured patients, PCPs reported positive impact on control of chronic conditions (74.4%), early detection of serious illness (71.1%), medication adherence (69.1%), health behaviors (56.5%), emotional well-being (57.0%), and the ability to work, attend school, or live independently (41.5%). HMP patients reportedly still had more difficulty than privately insured patients accessing some services. Most PCPs reported that their practices had, in the past year, hired clinicians (53.2%) and/or staff (57.5%); 15.4% had colocated mental health care. Few (15.8%) reported established patients' access to urgent appointments worsened.

LIMITATIONS

PCP reports of patient experiences may not be accurate. Results reflect the experiences of PCPs with ≥ 12 Medicaid patients. Differences between respondents and non-respondents present the possibility for response bias.

CONCLUSIONS

PCPs reported improved patient access to care, medication adherence, chronic condition management, and detection of serious illness. Established patients' access did not diminish, perhaps due to reported practice changes.

摘要

背景

密歇根州的医疗补助扩大方案,即健康密歇根计划(HMP),强调初级保健、预防以及对患者和初级保健医生(PCP)的激励措施。

目的

评估 PCP 对 HMP 对患者和实践的影响的看法。

设计

2014-2015 年,我们对 PCP 进行了半结构式访谈,然后对全州进行了调查。

地点

受访者来自五个密歇根地区不同类型的医疗机构,这些地区选择的原因是种族/民族多样性以及城乡混合设置。调查通过邮件发送。

参与者

受访者为医生(n=16)和非医生从业者(n=3)。所有为≥12 名 HMP 参保人提供护理的密歇根州 PCP 都接受了调查(回复率为 55.5%,N=2104)。

测量方法

PCP 对 HMP 患者的经验以及他们最近实践中的变化。

结果

访谈包括医疗补助扩大对患者和实践影响的例子。大多数接受调查的 PCP 报告说,新患者(52.3%)和多年未看 PCP 的患者(56.2%)最近有所增加。对于以前没有保险的患者,PCP 报告说对慢性病的控制(74.4%)、严重疾病的早期发现(71.1%)、药物依从性(69.1%)、健康行为(56.5%)、情绪健康(57.0%)以及工作、上学或独立生活的能力(41.5%)产生了积极影响。据报告,HMP 患者在获得某些服务方面仍然比私人保险患者困难。大多数 PCP 报告说,在过去的一年中,他们的实践雇佣了临床医生(53.2%)和/或员工(57.5%);15.4%的人将精神保健纳入其中。很少有(15.8%)报告称,已建立的患者获得紧急预约的机会恶化了。

局限性

PCP 对患者体验的报告可能不准确。结果反映了至少有 12 名医疗补助患者的 PCP 经验。受访者和非受访者之间的差异存在回应偏见的可能性。

结论

PCP 报告称患者获得医疗保健、药物依从性、慢性病管理和严重疾病发现的机会有所改善。已建立的患者的访问没有减少,这可能是由于报告的实践变化所致。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Impacts of early ACA Medicaid expansions on physician participation.ACA 医保早期扩张对医生参与的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug;57(4):881-891. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13925. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
5
How Would Low-Income Communities Prioritize Medicaid Spending?低收入社区将如何优先考虑医疗补助支出?
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2020 Jun 1;45(3):373-418. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8161024.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验