Hagberg Emilie, Flodin Stina, Granqvist Svante, Karsten Agneta, Neovius Erik, Lohmander Anette
1 Stockholm Craniofacial Team, Department of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery and Functional Area Speech Language Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
2 Division of Speech and Language Pathology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019 Apr;56(4):454-461. doi: 10.1177/1055665618784804. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
This study investigates the impact of maxillary advancement (Le Fort I osteotomy) on consonant proficiency in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) and explores how these patients and lay people perceive their speech 1 year post Le Fort I osteotomy.
Retrospective group study before and after treatment.
All patients with CLP who had undergone Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary retrognathia between 2007 and 2010 at Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden (n = 21). Six patients were excluded due to additional malformations and missing data. Two experienced speech and language pathologists assessed consonant proficiency, and speech accuracy was determined by lay listeners from pre- and postoperative standardized audio recordings. The patients' satisfaction with speech postoperatively was collected from medical records.
Percentage of oral consonants correct and acoustic analysis of /s/, lay listeners' opinion, and patients' satisfaction with speech.
One year postoperation, 11 of the 15 patients had improved articulation, especially on the /s/-sound, without speech intervention. The mean percentage of oral consonants correct before treatment (82%) was significantly improved later (95%; P > .01). This assessment was supported by the patients' satisfaction with speech. However, lay listeners' opinion on accuracy was inconsistent. Length of maxillary advancement or change in occlusion did not correlate with change in articulation.
Maxillary advancement performed to normalize occlusion and facial profile improved consonant proficiency in patients with CLP 1 year postoperation. Lay listeners' and patients' perceptions of speech need further exploration.
本研究调查上颌前徙术(勒福Ⅰ型截骨术)对唇腭裂(CLP)患者辅音发音能力的影响,并探讨这些患者及普通人群在勒福Ⅰ型截骨术后1年对其语音的感知情况。
治疗前后的回顾性分组研究。
2007年至2010年期间在瑞典卡罗林斯卡大学医院因上颌后缩接受勒福Ⅰ型截骨术的所有CLP患者(n = 21)。6名患者因合并其他畸形和数据缺失被排除。两名经验丰富的言语和语言病理学家评估辅音发音能力,言语准确性由普通听众根据术前和术后标准化录音确定。从病历中收集患者术后对语音的满意度。
口腔辅音正确百分比、/s/音的声学分析、普通听众的意见以及患者对语音的满意度。
术后1年,15名患者中有11名在未进行言语干预的情况下发音得到改善,尤其是/s/音。治疗前口腔辅音正确的平均百分比(82%)在后期显著提高(95%;P >.01)。这一评估得到了患者对语音满意度的支持。然而,普通听众对准确性的意见并不一致。上颌前徙的长度或咬合变化与发音变化无关。
为使咬合和面部轮廓正常化而进行的上颌前徙术在术后1年改善了CLP患者的辅音发音能力。普通听众和患者对语音的感知需要进一步探索。